by GoldCore
Friday’s AM fix was USD 1,295.75, EUR 944.15 and GBP 779.68 per ounce. Thursday’s AM fix was USD 1,295.00, EUR 942.09 and GBP 779.14 per ounce. Snapping its four-day losing streak, gold prices recovered very marginally yesterday. Traders said there was a revival of buying by retailers at these lower levels and this contributed to a marginal recovery in gold prices. Gold climbed $6.19 to $1298.69 at about 4AM EST before it fell back to a new 6-week low of $1285.81 in the next six hours of trade. It then bounced higher into the close and ended with a marginal gain of 0.02%. Silver slipped to as low as $19.649 before it also bounced back higher and ended with a gain of 0.2%. Gold remains near six week lows and is on track for a second straight weekly decline. Gold has dropped about $100 an ounce from a six-month high in the last nine trading sessions despite increasing concerns about the U.S. and global economy. Gold’s technical position is now negative and the close below $1,300/oz yesterday opens up the possibility of further falls to $1,270/oz and $1,200/oz. The sharp drop in prices in the last few days should bring physical buyers back into the market and support gold. A man who has been a trader for 33 years and works at a foreign-owned brokerage told the Financial Times that the tax increase represented a “good opportunity” to buy more gold as he was worried about holding too many yen-denominated assets. “I plan to hold it for a long time until there is a good time to sell, when the yen collapses or something,” he said. The surge in Japanese demand is small in tonnage terms in a global context and small vis a vis huge demand from India & especially China and from central banks but shows increasing concerns regarding currency debasement. Fed Stress Tests “Rattle Banks Around The World” Yesterday, the Federal Reserve’s stress tests led to jitters in financial markets and in the words of the Financial Times “rattled banks around the world.” Citigroup’s share price was hammered and fell 5.4%
The aftershock of the stress tests was felt beyond U.S. shores for the first time. The U.S. subsidiaries of Royal Bank of Scotland, Santander and HSBC all failed on “qualitative” grounds, which includes failing to project losses rigorously when contemplating a severe recession or market meltdown. The Fed said that the banks management practices or capital cushions are not robust enough to withstand a severe economic downturn. Not surprisingly, the banks themselves accused the stress tests as being “opaque”.
Twenty five other banks took part in the Fed's annual "stress test" and received a green light for their planned dividend payouts and share repurchases. Bank of America and Goldman Sachs initially fell short of minimum capital requirements. However, they met the standards after reducing their planned dividend payments and share buybacks over the past week.
The banks now have 90 days to address the weaknesses and risks identified by the Fed and resubmit their dividend and share buyback plans.
The Fed's decision was part of the annual checkup it requires of banks with more than $50 billion in assets. Banks must now undergo tests to ensure they can endure shocks like those that upended the banking system and led to the massive government bailouts in the 2008 financial crisis. In what the Fed sees as the extreme scenario, the test assumed a rise in the 6.7% unemployment rate to 11.2%, a 50% drop in stock prices and a decline in home prices to 2001 levels. All of which appear a strong possibility given debt burdened state of the tapped out U.S. consumer and the poor fundamentals of the U.S. economy. |
No comments:
Post a Comment