Showing posts with label trading. Show all posts
Showing posts with label trading. Show all posts

Monday, December 2, 2013

TRADING RESULTS OF 29 NOVEMBER







Click on the icons below to open the related statements
 
 
- $ 401.98

1296672115_Stocks_thumb111[3]
Statement of Super Commodity system with $ 100K
 
+ $ 150.66
1296672115_Stocks_thumb11[3]
Statement of Super Commodity system with $ 60K
 
- $ 75.82
1296672115_Stocks_thumb21[3]
Statement of Galaxy portfolio system with $ 100K
 
 
Commodity3_thumb_thumb_thumb

SYMPLE AND STRICT TRADING RULES
With our Super Commodity trading system can operate on all commodities markets with a simple, safe and reliable method, generating significant capital growth independent of stock and bond markets, with simple and strict trading rules and risk management rules.

Our Super Commodity Trading Signal Service takes + 262.59 % from 1 January 2009 to 29 November 2013!

Rules6122[2]

   
TRADING SIGNALS SERVICE
Minimum Account Size $ 80-100K
Historical Drawdon $ 25K
Max RisK Per Trade $ 2500/contract
 

We pleased to offer to ours readers the opportunity to test and evaluate for free for 30 days the full version of Super Commodity system. The signals service with all trading signals will be sent by email at the end of day, around 6:00pm Eastern time, and in case again in the next day to intraday updates, through a daily report like this. In addition, customers may view at any time the trading signals also on a special page through secure internet access.

After the free trial period, the service will continue to pay a monthly $ 395.00 fee. To activate the service, use the free trial period and receive daily updates please contact me. 
 
michele.giardina@quantusnews.com
MANAGED ACCOUNT SERVICE
Minimum Account Size $ 60-80K
Historical Drawdon $ 25K
RisK Per Trade $ 2500/contract
 


Our company receives a limited power of attorney on an account that the client opens with the broker Berkeley Futures (www.bfl.co.uk) or Interactive Brokers (www.interactivebrokers.com).




Will be applied management fee 2% annum charged quaterly, performance fee 30% per year charged quaterly. To get info please contact me. 


michele.giardina@quantusnews.com
   

Disclaimer
Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns. Operate with any financial instrument is safe, even higher if working on derivatives. Be sure to operate only with capital that you can lose. Past performance of the methods described on this blog do not constitute any guarantee for future earnings. The reader should be held responsible for the risks of their investments and for making use of the information contained in the pages of this blog. Coincollector should not be considered in any way responsible for any financial losses suffered by the user of the information contained on this blog.

TRADING RESULTS OF 27 NOVEMBER







Click on the icons below to open the related statements
 
 
+ $ 1747.32

1296672115_Stocks_thumb111
Statement of Super Commodity system with $ 100K
 
+ $ 1729.26
1296672115_Stocks_thumb11
Statement of Super Commodity system with $ 60K
 
+ $ 2354.79
1296672115_Stocks_thumb21
Statement of Galaxy portfolio system with $ 100K
 
Commodity3_thumb_thumb

SYMPLE AND STRICT TRADING RULES
With our Super Commodity trading system can operate on all commodities markets with a simple, safe and reliable method, generating significant capital growth independent of stock and bond markets, with simple and strict trading rules and risk management rules.

Our Super Commodity Trading Signal Service takes + 262.59 % from 1 January 2009 to 29 November 2013!

Rules6122

   
TRADING SIGNALS SERVICE
Minimum Account Size $ 80-100K
Historical Drawdon $ 25K
Max RisK Per Trade $ 2500/contract
 

We pleased to offer to ours readers the opportunity to test and evaluate for free for 30 days the full version of Super Commodity system. The signals service with all trading signals will be sent by email at the end of day, around 6:00pm Eastern time, and in case again in the next day to intraday updates, through a daily report like this. In addition, customers may view at any time the trading signals also on a special page through secure internet access.

After the free trial period, the service will continue to pay a monthly $ 395.00 fee. To activate the service, use the free trial period and receive daily updates please contact me. 
 
contact me
MANAGED ACCOUNT SERVICE
Minimum Account Size $ 60-80K
Historical Drawdon $ 25K
RisK Per Trade $ 2500/contract
 


Our company receives a limited power of attorney on an account that the client opens with the broker Berkeley Futures (www.bfl.co.uk) or Interactive Brokers (www.interactivebrokers.com).




Will be applied management fee 2% annum charged quaterly, performance fee 30% per year charged quaterly. To get info please contact me. 


michele.giardina@quantusnews.comcontact me
   

Disclaimer
Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns. Operate with any financial instrument is safe, even higher if working on derivatives. Be sure to operate only with capital that you can lose. Past performance of the methods described on this blog do not constitute any guarantee for future earnings. The reader should be held responsible for the risks of their investments and for making use of the information contained in the pages of this blog. Coincollector should not be considered in any way responsible for any financial losses suffered by the user of the information contained on this blog.

RISULTATI TRADING DEL 27 NOVEMBRE







Cliccare sulle sottostanti icone per aprire gli statements
 
 
+ $ 1747.32
1296672115_Stocks_thumb
Statement di Super Commodity system con $ 100K
 
+ $ 1729.26
1296672115_Stocks_thumb1
Statement di Super Commodity system con $ 60K
 
+ $ 2354.79
1296672115_Stocks_thumb2
Statement Galaxy portfolio system con $ 100K
 
Commodity3_thumb

SEMPLICI E RIGOROSE REGOLE DI TRADING
Il nostro sistema di trading Super Commodity è in grado di operare su tutti i mercati, in particolare sulle materie prime, con un metodo semplice, sicuro ed affidabile, generando una crescita significativa del capitale gestito in maniera indipendente dai mercati azionari e obbligazionari, con regole di trading semplici e rigorose, e con un sofisticato metodo di gestione del rischio.

Il nostro Super Commodity system ha generato una performance pari a + 262.59 % dal 1 Gennaio 2009 al 29 Novembre 2013!

Rules612

   
SEGNALI DI TRADING
Capitale Iniziale Minimo $ 80-100K
Massimo Rischio Storico $ 25K
Massimo Rischio Per Trade $ 2500/contract
Offriamo ai nostri lettori l’opportunità di testare e valutare in maniera completamente gratuita per 30 giorni il nostro Super commodity System. Tutti i giorni attorno alle ore 24:00 verrà spedito via email un report come questo, comprensivo di tutti i segnali di trading per la giornata successiva. Inoltre i clienti potranno collegarsi al nostro server in qualsiasi momento e prendere visione dei segnali operativi.
Al termine del periodo di prova il cliente potrà sottoscrivere il servizio vero e proprio. Il costo ammonta a € 295/Mese. Per richiedere il periodo di prova, attivare il servizio e per qualsiasi informazione contattatemi. 
michele.giardina@quantusnews.com
MANAGED ACCOUNT
Capitale Iniziale Minimo $ 60-80K
Massimo Rischio Storico $ 25K
Massimo Rischio Per Trade 2500/contract
La nostra società dovrà ricevere il limited power of attorney per il conto trading personale che il cliente dovrà aprire presso i seguenti brokers, Berkeley Futures (www.bfl.co.uk) o Interactive Brokers (www.interactivebrokers.com).



Al conto saranno applicate la management fee annuale del 2% e che verrà addebitata trimestralmente, e la performance fee del 30% annua che verrà addebitata mensilmente. Siete pregati ci contattarmi per tutte le info eventualmente necessarie.

michele.giardina@quantusnews.com
   

Disclaimer
Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns. Operate with any financial instrument is safe, even higher if working on derivatives. Be sure to operate only with capital that you can lose. Past performance of the methods described on this blog do not constitute any guarantee for future earnings. The reader should be held responsible for the risks of their investments and for making use of the information contained in the pages of this blog. Coincollector should not be considered in any way responsible for any financial losses suffered by the user of the information contained on this blog.

Sunday, December 1, 2013

News … we publish the daily statements with the results of our systems


Sorry for delay ..

We begin to publish the statements relating to three different management accounts.

Anyone interested in replicating one of these portfolios on his account can contact me.

They are also available to give you all the necessary info.

Regards

Michele

Friday, November 29, 2013

TRADING RESULTS OF 26 NOVEMBER







Click on the icons below to open the related statements
 
+ $ 1298.40

1296672115_Stocks_thumb
Statement of Super Commodity system with $ 100K
 
+ $ 1430.24
1296672115_Stocks_thumb1
Statement of Super Commodity system with $ 60K
 
+ $ 759.90
1296672115_Stocks_thumb2
Statement of Galaxy portfolio system with $ 100K
 
Commodity3_thumb

SYMPLE AND STRICT TRADING RULES
With our Super Commodity trading system can operate on all commodities markets with a simple, safe and reliable method, generating significant capital growth independent of stock and bond markets, with simple and strict trading rules and risk management rules.

Our Super Commodity Trading Signal Service takes + 262.59 % from 1 January 2009 to 29 November 2013!

Rules612
   
TRADING SIGNALS SERVICE
Minimum Account Size $ 80-100K
Historical Drawdon $ 25K
Max RisK Per Trade $ 2500/contract
 

We pleased to offer to ours readers the opportunity to test and evaluate for free for 30 days the full version of Super Commodity system. The signals service with all trading signals will be sent by email at the end of day, around 6:00pm Eastern time, and in case again in the next day to intraday updates, through a daily report like this. In addition, customers may view at any time the trading signals also on a special page through secure internet access.

After the free trial period, the service will continue to pay a monthly $ 395.00 fee. To activate the service, use the free trial period and receive daily updates please contact me. 
 
michele.giardina@quantusnews.commichele.giardina@quantusnews.com
MANAGED ACCOUNT SERVICE
Minimum Account Size $ 60-80K
Historical Drawdon $ 25K
RisK Per Trade $ 2500/contract
 


Our company receives a limited power of attorney on an account that the client opens with the broker Berkeley Futures (www.bfl.co.uk) or Interactive Brokers (www.interactivebrokers.com).




Will be applied management fee 2% annum charged quaterly, performance fee 30% per year charged quaterly. To get info please contact me. 


michele.giardina@quantusnews.commichele.giardina@quantusnews.com
   

Disclaimer
Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns. Operate with any financial instrument is safe, even higher if working on derivatives. Be sure to operate only with capital that you can lose. Past performance of the methods described on this blog do not constitute any guarantee for future earnings. The reader should be held responsible for the risks of their investments and for making use of the information contained in the pages of this blog. Coincollector should not be considered in any way responsible for any financial losses suffered by the user of the information contained on this blog.

Our Super Commodity System Updating


Thursday, November 28, 2013

RISULTATI TRADING DEL 26 NOVEMBRE







Cliccare sulle sottostanti icone per aprire gli statements
 
+ $ 1298.40
1296672115_Stocks
Statement di Super Commodity system con $ 100K
 
+ $ 1430.24
1296672115_Stocks
Statement di Super Commodity system con $ 60K
 
+ $ 759.90
1296672115_Stocks
Statement Galaxy portfolio system con $ 100K
 
Commodity3

SEMPLICI E RIGOROSE REGOLE DI TRADING
Il nostro sistema di trading Super Commodity è in grado di operare su tutti i mercati, in particolare sulle materie prime, con un metodo semplice, sicuro ed affidabile, generando una crescita significativa del capitale gestito in maniera indipendente dai mercati azionari e obbligazionari, con regole di trading semplici e rigorose, e con un sofisticato metodo di gestione del rischio.

Il nostro Super Commodity system ha generato una performance pari a + 262.59 % dal 1 Gennaio 2009 al 29 Novembre 2013!

Rules61
   
SEGNALI DI TRADING
Capitale Iniziale Minimo $ 80-100K
Massimo Rischio Storico $ 25K
Massimo Rischio Per Trade $ 2500/contract
Offriamo ai nostri lettori l’opportunità di testare e valutare in maniera completamente gratuita per 30 giorni il nostro Super commodity System. Tutti i giorni attorno alle ore 24:00 verrà spedito via email un report come questo, comprensivo di tutti i segnali di trading per la giornata successiva. Inoltre i clienti potranno collegarsi al nostro server in qualsiasi momento e prendere visione dei segnali operativi.
Al termine del periodo di prova il cliente potrà sottoscrivere il servizio vero e proprio. Il costo ammonta a € 295/Mese. Per richiedere il periodo di prova, attivare il servizio e per qualsiasi informazione contattatemi. 
MANAGED ACCOUNT
Capitale Iniziale Minimo $ 60-80K
Massimo Rischio Storico $ 25K
Massimo Rischio Per Trade 2500/contract
La nostra società dovrà ricevere il limited power of attorney per il conto trading personale che il cliente dovrà aprire presso i seguenti brokers, Berkeley Futures (www.bfl.co.uk) o Interactive Brokers (www.interactivebrokers.com).



Al conto saranno applicate la management fee annuale del 2% e che verrà addebitata trimestralmente, e la performance fee del 30% annua che verrà addebitata mensilmente. Siete pregati ci contattarmi per tutte le info eventualmente necessarie.

   

Disclaimer
Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns. Operate with any financial instrument is safe, even higher if working on derivatives. Be sure to operate only with capital that you can lose. Past performance of the methods described on this blog do not constitute any guarantee for future earnings. The reader should be held responsible for the risks of their investments and for making use of the information contained in the pages of this blog. Coincollector should not be considered in any way responsible for any financial losses suffered by the user of the information contained on this blog.

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

The Importance of Defense


The news is frightful. The economy is in the doldrums. Europe is crumbling. The markets are up 4oo one day and down 400 the next. Thoughts of 2008, when venerable institutions, Lehman Brothers and Bear Sterns, — remember them? — fell like dominoes play in the minds of investors. There are never any certainties in life or in the markets for that matter, but seriously, what is an investor to do?

Three words….Defense! Defense! Defense!

Defense is not only important for success on the court or ball field but also on the playing field of investing as well. How many investors wish they could do 2008 all over again? Of course, 2008 marked the second bear market in 8 years, and many investors suffered losses to their portfolios exceeding 40%.

Why is defense so important when investing? The math is simple, and this is all you need to know. Say your portfolio incurs a 10% loss. To make back your losses, you need to gain 11%. Very doable and very reasonable. Now your portfolio incurs a 20% loss. To get your portfolio back to even, you need to score a 25% gain. However, there is one problem. Gains like that don’t come along too often. Since 1973, the SP500 has gained greater than 25% (in any one calendar year) only 3 times. Get into a 40% loss like most investors did in 2008, and you will need a 66% gain just to break even!! Needless to say if your portfolio suffers extreme losses, it will be a long time before you are made whole again.

Fortunately, when it comes to investing, playing defense is relatively easy. Unfortunately for investors, they usually don’t think of defense until their portfolios have suffered those crushing losses. So what can you do to play better investing defense?

Here are 4 steps you can implement right away. The first and probably best thing you can do for your financial health is to have an investing plan. Our lives are busy and complicated enough, so having a professional financial advisor craft and execute a plan for you is essential. It is worth the money. Successful endeavors usually require discipline and skill, and investing is no different. The second thing you can do is to be diversified in your investments. Don’t put all your eggs in one basket. The third step is to be data centric in your approach. Avoid the water cooler tips and do your homework from the many credible resources on the internet. Fourth, always question the prevailing dogma and never believe that “this time is different” because it usually isn’t.

For many investors, playing defense is akin to sacrificing gains. Academic research and history tells us that you can construct winning strategies that play both offense and defense. You don’t have to sacrifice rewards to control your risk. From this vantage point, successful investing starts with avoiding a hole that you cannot get out of.

So put your game face on. Knuckle down. And play some investing Defense!

See the original article >>

Monday, September 12, 2011

Attention Human Trader, You Are No Longer Needed

By Guest Author

If there are any human traders still out there that happen to be reading this, the UK Foresight project team has some news for you : don’t expect to be trading for much longer. Here is what the report had to say: Read Paper Here

“It is reasonable to speculate that the number of human traders involved in the financial markets could fall dramatically over the next ten years. While unlikely, it is not impossible that human traders will simply no longer be required at all in some market roles. The simple fact is that we humans are made from hardware that is just too bandwidth-limited, and too slow, to compete with coming waves of computer technology.”

The UK Foresight project is a group of academics from over 20 countries who decided to get together and study the effects of computer based trading. Lots of familiar academics names appear in the report including the pro-HFT academic crowd of Brogaard, Angel and Hendershott. And lots of the same old, tired defenses of HFT appear in the report: no evidence that HFT increase volatility, liquidity has improved and transaction costs have been lowered. No doubt this report will be picked up by the HFT lobby and their friendly media contacts and waved around telling people that all is well in the stock market.
But the report does raise some major concerns. Two of which are feedback loops and market manipulation.

Six different types of feedback loops are identified: Risk, Volume, Shallowness, News, Delay and Index loops. You can read more about these on page 14 of the report but the bottom line is that many HFT systems are very similar and tend to react to each other when unexpected events occur. The report says:

“The direct link between market outcomes and the fundamental events that ought to act as anchors for valuation has been severed and replaced by a complex web of iterated and nested beliefs.”

“A liquidity shock on one venue that might have gone unnoticed if there was one large centralised exchange can now affect prices on that venue. In normal times, the aberrant price would quickly disappear as cross-trading-venue HFTs buy low and sell high. But in stressed times, the capital of HFTs may be limited, or the HFTs themselves may start to doubt the prices (as happened during the Flash Crash) and refrain from arbitraging. Real-money investors then start to mistrust valuations across the board, and the resulting pressures mean that HFTs no longer contribute to liquidity provision, which makes price divergence across trading venues worse still. And so the shock is transmitted through the network, and its effects are reinforced by positive feedback. Trades and transactions will happen at socially inefficient prices, and mark-to-market valuations can only be done to multiple and illiquid marks. Understanding how to avoid such situations, and to contain them when they do occur, is a topic for further research.”

They must be kidding? They just described how flash crashes happen and then leave it by saying they need further research on how to contain them. We will save you the trouble and all the hours of research with one simple word: Fragmentation. Without fragmented markets and multiple liquidity pools, the situation that is described above does not occur.

There is much more in the Foresight report but we just wanted to touch on one more subject they brought up: market manipulation.

“Negative effects on efficiency can arise if HF traders pursue market manipulation strategies. Strategies such as front running, quote stuffing (placing and then immediately cancelling orders), and layering (using hidden orders on one side and visible orders on the other) can be used to manipulate prices. For example, deterministic algorithmic trading such as VWAP (volume weighted average price) strategies can be front-run by other algorithms programmed to recognise such trading. Momentum ignition strategies, which essentially induce algorithms to compete with other algorithms, can push prices away from fundamental values.”

So, be gone human trader. You are no longer needed as now we have a system in place which has the potential to crash at any time due to feedback loops and where market manipulation “strategies” run rampant. And, luddite, don’t you dare complain or raise objections because technology is always good and always increases efficiency. Right?

Friday, August 12, 2011

Option Decay and the Days of Our Lives


TIME IS ON YOUR SIDE
“Time is on my side, yes it is…You’ll come runnin’ back, you’ll come runnin’ back, you’ll come runnin’ back to me.” ~Rolling Stones

Who would have thought that The Stones were cutting edge advocates of selling options? After all these years, it finally dawned on me that Mick and Keith devoted this song to the propensity for option prices to “run” back to their strike price, and eventually expire worthless. Of course, they were also telling people to “get off their cloud” well before cloud computing became the newest rage.

The purpose of this article is to acquaint the reader with one of the elements used to price options-time. In a way, this component would seem to be intuitively simple. Perhaps the reason for the perceived simplicity is that many are familiar with the traditional real estate option. Generally, the plain vanilla real estate option creates a contract where a property owner will, for a fee, grant a potential buyer an option to buy subject property for a set price, within a stated time period. It is anticipated that the price of the option will vary, and the chief determinant of that variation is time. This aspect is readily understood, as an owner of property will refuse to encumber his property, unless adequate consideration is paid to compensate for a given time interval. And, as everyone knows, if the option is not exercised, the property owner will pocket the option money.

In the typical real estate scenario, the buyer probably has a legitimate interest in buying the property. But, during real estate bubbles, the buyer may want to “flip” the option to someone else and collect a fee for selling the option. Whatever the circumstance, if one were asked to ‘value’ the subject option on a daily basis, the value ascertained would no doubt reflect a linear amortization. Thus, the stated price of the option, divided by the number of days in the option period, would yield a daily value. On any given day, the preceding day represents a value proportionately greater than the next day, and so on. So, the tick of the clock and the passage of days are quite predictable, as the option decays in linear fashion. We can conclude that there is absolutely no ‘sensitivity’ to any external event. Suppose that on the morning of the last day of the option contract, developer announces major development plans for the immediate area. The announcement causes real estate values to skyrocket in the surrounding area, including the subject property.

In order to put time on our side we must understand risk and the concept of mathematical expectancy. In the above real estate example, we altered the facts to allow for a spike in value. In the final analysiseven the simple real estate option isn’t linear in reality- although, for accounting purposes, linear amortization is the norm. Suppose that a mere rumor surfaced about the development, as opposed to a definitive announcement. Or, to take another perspective, assume that the subject property was suddenly re-zoned in such a way as to lower its present value.

HICKORY DICKORY DOCK – OPTION TRADERS BET ON THE CLOCK

Both the buyer and seller of an option are betting on the clock. The buyer of an option wants enough time for the option to gain more than he paid for it. On the other hand, the seller hopes to simply run out the clock. In short, the option seller is betting on either a static or decaying universe. (As an interesting aside, the Second Law of Thermodynamics gives the edge to decay, or entropy). In any event, however, time transforms and shapes risk. The game will always begin at a point defined as ‘now’, and continue until some specified date in the future.

As to the subject of options, studies show that most options expire worthless. There is some debate as to the exact percentage, as well as the assessment methodology, but even a conservative number indicates an expiration ratio of some seventy percent. If a casino is perfectly happy with a winning ratio of fifty-one percent, a ratio approaching even the most conservative option expiration estimate would make for some very happy casino owners.

THE DAYS OF OUR LIVES
“Like sands through the hour glass, so are the days of our lives.” MacDonald Carey

Mr Carey probably had options on his mind, as he so elegantly and poignantly spoke those words for so many years. In dealing with the concept of time via option risk, we must change our perception of the speed at which the grains of sand flow through our ‘hourglass.’ Specifically, while we know that a 30 day option must expire on or before the clock runs out, the sand can actually accelerate or even recapture some grains before the ultimate result.

Imagine a giant warehouse, full of thousands upon thousands of clocks. All of these clocks are set to sound their alarm at precisely the same time. But, to an observer, something is terribly inconsistent. It appears that every clock is either too fast or too slow to possibly chime in unison at the specified time. Yet, we know that all of the thousands of clocks will converge, finally sounding a cacophony of chimes-at the precise moment. If we had an ‘hourglass’ that was converted to a thirty day structure, we could go away for the requisite time period and return to find that all of the sand had filtered from the top portion of our massive time piece, to the bottom. Supposethat we left a video camera to record the second-by second movement of the sand. What a strange and curious video we would encounter.

Even though the ‘days of our lives’ run on a strictly linear process, our time-piece is non-linear, as are the thousands of clocks in our warehouse. Thus time is somewhat of an illusion when we suspend the rules of linearity. Of course, as The Guess Who emphatically state, when there is no more time, there truly is no more time. Sothe game will end at the buzzer, as expected, and all clocks will chime in final harmony. It can be said that we perceive ‘time distortion’ thru the relative position of volatility. At various points along our thirty day time journey, it will seem that we travel at different speeds. At times, it appears that we walk in slow motion, and at other times, we travel on a rocket. But, despite our own particular clock or mode of travel, we can never completely reach our destination ahead of time. On the other hand, we are allowed to freeze our clock or cut our trip short.

NOT EVEN THE ROCKS LIVE FOREVER

A pessimist might point out that we begin to die at birth. It is certainly the case though; that an option will begin to die at the moment it is contracted. It should come as no surprise that there is a precise mathematical equation that reflects this fundamental law. In fact, Fischer Black and Myron Scholes brought a mathematical approach to options pricing in 1973, with the publication of their seminal piece in ‘The Journal of Political Economy.’ Robert Merton extended the model, and a Nobel Prize in Economic Services was awarded in 1997 for their efforts. Of course, genius alone is no defense against an often bewildering market, as evidenced by Merton and Scholes’ links to the Long-Term Capital Management debacle.

And, I’ve known math doctorates that can pontificate on options pricing methodology, but who somehow can’t seem to parlay that knowledge base into profitable trading strategies. So, just as some truly great musicians can play by ‘ear,’ so it is that one can become a very successful options trader, without possessing a strong mathematical background. Perhaps, the best advice is given by Jesse Livermore, as reflected more recently by Paul Tudor Jones:
“…I am leery of traders who have never lost it all. I think that intense feeling of desperation that accompanies such a horrifically deflating experience indelibly cauterizes great risk management reflexes into a trader’s very being.”

With that admonition in mind, the more mathematically inclined might read the appropriate sections dealing with the concept of ‘theta,’ in “Applied Math for Derivatives,” by John S. Martin. (See in particular pages 337-40/Sec. 12.5.4). The author provides the equation for calculating decay, and provides illustrations, including graphs, depicting the non-linear aspects relative to option decay). Of course, there are any numbers of option text-books that discuss this subject.

My suggestion is that you get a “feel” for non-linear decay by selling a covered call against 100 shares of stock that you own. If that isn’t viable at the moment, pretend that you either buy or sell a call of a stock that interests you, and carefully study the theta-and total value-of that option for thirty days. Draw an intraday graph, and save your coordinates to plot on a thirty day chart. At the end of that time, compare your project with a graphical illustration in an options textbook. Again, theta is the term used to describe the time decay associated with option decay. Theta is presented as a negative number, such as -.25, which simply means that an option contract with said theta will decay at a rate of .25 per day. The rate of decay is a function of the square root of the option. So, the rate of decay, as we’ve noted, is not linear. As one might intuitively expect, a longer-dated option decays at a slower rate than an option set to expire in two weeks.

 Please remember, though, that you are attempting to isolate one component, for study purposes, and that interim fluctuations in the total price of the option will be a function of all the variables in the pricing model. In other words, you are attempting to learn about how the liver works, while recognizing that the other organs in the body are just as vital.

THETA MANAGEMENT AND COMMON MISPERCEPTIONS

It’s probably reasonable to assume that most people, and particularly those with a degree of market experience, realize that time and risk are intimately related. Increased time in the markets translates to a greater degree of risk. Of course, market risk can be hedged.

But, given what we know about option decay, are there more refined ways to think about the design and implementation of optimal strategies? Can we actually apply some of the traditional concepts of game theory to portfolio or trading management?

This is a complex-and provocative-topic, and only a cursory perspective is offered at this point- given time and space limitations, but feel free to ask questions in the comment section below . But let’s begin by addressing an extraordinary fallacy that appears repeatedly in various financial blogs and articles. These articles are not academic papers by any means, but nonetheless, they probably do substantial damage to traders and investors. The fallacy referred to is actually a mixture of ‘post hoc’ homilies and inadequate training/experience of numerous financial pundits.

These fallacies include:
  • The selling of an option is a one-dimensional process by which the seller of a given option is “locked” into the results flowing there from;
  • Option pricing methodology invariably creates a so-called “zero-sum” event.
These are two quite superficial-and distorted comments that appear time and again when options are discussed, if not maligned-particularly by non-experts in the field. The above are somewhat interrelated. So, are options really a zero-sum proposition?

I think it more precise to simply state that there is an approximate symmetry, but only within an initial one-plane dimension. A zero-sum result is a consequence of staying within this one-dimensional plane. In the option universe, multiple dimensions exist. There are other reasons to discount the zero-sum perspective, which are beyond the scope and purpose of this article. However, if you realize that, in reality, the so-called ‘person’ on the other side of your option transaction is little more than a fiction, you begin to understand the real game.

The other person at the moment of this mythical transaction, is a computer ledger. The market maker must accept your bet and hedge accordingly. As an example, if you take $100 cash and deposit it in your checking account, does that mean that said $100 resides in your account? Of course not! Just as your bank deposit does not reflect the exact physical currency initially entrusted by you, so it is with any type of currency exchange. The real estate contract of purchase and sale, which is often used to explain options, is, as we noted previously, terribly misleading.

Complex option strategies form patterns and structures that change from moment to moment. Yet, in a complex, bounded structure, we may observe patterns that are orderly in space and disorderly in time and others orderly in time and disorderly in space. And because options are derivative instruments, virtually all patterns constitute a set of “Russian dolls”- that is to say, we expect to find fractals. Volatility, much like heat in relation to the boiling point of water, will represent a zone from a steady state (except for time decay), to a pattern that oscillates within the prescribed boundary. This boundary is pre-determined by the strategist. All points within the strategy set, and the impact thereof, are confined within this zone. Knowing the boundary limits allows for fine-tuning. It is the fine-tuning or adjustment alternatives, deployed at the right time, which can create a differential advantage over forces that appear random.

FINAL THOUGHTS

If we are short an option, we are not locked in to an unwanted assignment, should the market not be in our favor as expiration approaches. An option can be ‘reset’ much as one can turn over an hourglass, and the game can continue-so the concept of expiration is highly misleading, and compels the novice to abandon positions at a loss. In theory, the game has no end, and I’ve seen documented records where one persistent trader rolled out of a position for 2 1/2 years-finally winning the game. One way of thinking about this is to realize that a short option can always be reincarnated, whereas a long option, as it decays, will vanish from the universe forever.

Bear in mind that the purchase of an uncovered long option requires that an event occur. The seller of an option, as noted above, wants nothing to happen. In that regard, note as follows:
  • Buying an option requires one to know something the market doesn’t i.e. otherwise the market has presumably determined the correct price (e.g. merger, earnings surprise, etc.)
  • Buying an option also requires an informed opinion as to the elements that determine the price of said option, especially implied volatility (the value of an option can actually decrease even where the stock moves up).

Wednesday, August 10, 2011

4 Hidden Risks in Your Portfolio


In recent days, queasy investors have run from stocks to bonds and cash -- and, as of yesterday, back to stocks again. But when investors get react to daily market moves, they often go too far, experts say, when there are smaller, hidden tweaks they could make that would bolster good days and bad.

Investing is inherently risky -- stock prices drop, companies default on their debt, even sitting in cash runs the risk of failing to keep up with inflation. And much of it, investors don't control -- including an unprecedented ratings downgrade for U.S. government debt, for example, or the precipitous, unforeseen market drops of the last two weeks. Even so, there is plenty that investors can do, including making sure that there's enough diversity in their investments, to prevent everything from moving in lock-step and having a clear, long-term plan, which can offer perspective when the short-term doesn't seem to be going your way. "If you focus on those big levers that you absolutely can control then you actually stand a great chance of being successful," says Chris Philips, senior investment analyst for Vanguard's investment strategy group.

Obviously, there's no way to eliminate all the risks in investing. Sometimes, surviving a market swoon feels like exactly that: Survival. But there's no reason to make it worse than it has to be. Here are four common investing mistakes that add unnecessary risk to a portfolio -- and how to fix them:
Mistake #1: Bonds equal safety
Reality: Some bonds are safer than others

Until last week, U.S. Treasurys were considered absolutely risk-free, with no chance at all that the issuer (a.k.a. Uncle Sam) would fail to pay up. Post-downgrade, investors may be able to see a bigger picture: Bonds of all kinds can carry hidden risks. They still have a place in a portfolio, advisers say, usually to generate income and to provide stability -- when stocks fall, bonds often rise, or at least don't fall by as much. But within the universe of bonds, there's a wide range of risks that make some issues far more vulnerable to big losses than others. One big one: The more a bond pays in yield, the riskier it is. High-yield corporate bonds, for example, commonly called "junk" bonds, can offer yields an average 6.6 percentage points above Treasurys. They also have a higher risk of default. Over the last 12 months, 2.2% of high-yield bonds defaulted, according to Standard & Poor's Global Fixed Income Research; during the same period, no investment-grade bonds did.

The fix: Don't chase yield.

Even with high-yield bonds, the odds are still in the investor's favor, but they're also some of the more volatile issues around, with prices that tend to rise and fall more like jittery stocks than mellow bonds. To reduce risk, investors should have no more than 7% of their bond portfolio in high-yield bonds, says Ron Florance, managing director of investment strategy at Wells Fargo Private Bank, and they should diversify with other bonds, such as municipal bonds, investment grade corporates and foreign issues. And while investors can't control rising interest rates, which also erode the value of bonds, Florance recommends sticking to bonds with low maturities -- about seven years or less -- because they will get hurt less if rates go up. 

Mistake #2: You're plenty diversified
Reality: A dozen funds -- or even a mix of stocks and bonds -- may not cut it

Households that invest in mutual funds own about seven funds apiece, on average, according to 2010 data from the Investment Company Institute, a mutual fund industry trade group. That ought to be enough to get good and diversified, no? A closer look often reveals that even with a passel of funds, portfolios can be far more concentrated than they first appear. Investors often fail to realize that they can be holding two or more funds with very similar strategies, which isn't always apparent in a fund's name or track record, says Todd Rosenbluth, a mutual fund analyst for S&P Equity Research. An investor who owned the $61 billion Fidelity Contrafund and the $24 billion T. Rowe Price Growth Stock fund, for example, would end up essentially doubling down on information technology and consumer discretionary stocks, according to S&P.
Meanwhile, too many investors ignore the asset classes that could boost their portfolios when the typical mainstays, like stocks and bonds, aren't cutting it, says Robert Weidemer, managing director of Absolute Investment Management, a Bethesda, Md.-based wealth management firm. He says he uses exchange-traded funds to allocate about 20% of his clients' portfolios to gold and silver, which tend to hold up when stocks are tanking. And at a time when growth in the U.S. is sluggish, it may be smart to increase exposure to international stocks and says Eleanor Blayney, consumer advocate for the Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards, a nonprofit that certifies advisers.

The fix: Look beneath the hood.

Investors should take a look at the holdings in their mutual funds to watch for overlap in sectors or company names, says Rosenbluth. The fund's website should list the fund's top 10 holdings and break down its allocation to certain sectors, he says. Morningstar and S&P also offer online tools that help investors review the holdings in their portfolios.
Mistake #3: You'll know when to sell 
Reality: Most people sell too late


No one plans on riding a losing stock all the way to the basement. To the contrary, many investors plan on selling out of positions when a stock or index falls below a certain point. Then the time arrives, and they find they can't pull the trigger, says Nate Peterson, senior derivatives analyst for Charles Schwab. And it only gets worse: Eventually they sell, locking in large losses, and thus burned, they often wait far too long to get back into the market. With that kind of pattern, it can take a long time simply to get back to even, says Stephen Horan, head of private wealth management for the CFA Institute.
The fix: Make it automatic

That point at which you'd plan to sell? Set what's called a stop-loss order on your stock or fund positions, which instructs your brokerage to automatically sell stocks once they fall below a certain price. They're free to set up and they help you avoid the emotional paralysis that sets in when it's time to make a trade, says Peterson. The catch: investors who use stop-loss orders can miss out on market rebounds if they don't have a strategy for getting back into the market, says Brent Burns, president of Asset Dedication, an investment adviser firm in Mill Valley, Calif. Investors should set up stop loss orders for when certain holdings fall between 10% and 30% below the purchase price, says Horan, and rebalance their portfolios after big market movements to make sure their target allocations are in place. Taking those losses isn't all terrible, he adds, because investors can take some of the investment losses as a tax write-off.
Mistake #4: You think you have a plan
Reality: You make investment decisions on a whim

When the market had one of its worst days in history this week many investors may have found themselves without a blueprint for what to do next, says Horan. In fact, most investors tend not to have a long term investment plan at all, he adds. And even those who are working with a pro may find themselves without a concrete plan they can turn to. A June survey of 1,011 adults by KRC Research for the Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards found that just 42% of those surveyed had a written document outlining their financial plans; another 11% barely had more than a few notes and ideas. But experts warn investors can shortchange themselves in the long haul if they are too reactionary with their decisions. Says Vanguard's Philips: "If they're focusing on the here and now and lose sight of that long term objective then they could end up doing more harm than good."

The fix: Put it on paper

It can help to list out your investment preferences and outline the parameters you want to set on your portfolio, says Horan. That includes laying out how much equity exposure you can tolerate along with minimums for what you want to hold in other sectors like bonds or cash. Your financial plan can also detail what adjustments, if any, you'd like to make after a large market movement -- before it happens, says Horan: "It helps keep a much steadier hand at the wheel."

Friday, July 29, 2011

The Managed Futures Landscape

by Jeff Malec

Although we’re a few weeks past the end of the 2nd quarter and midpoint of the year (and embroiled in the debt ceiling drama), we managed to sneak in a little time to update the charts and graphs measuring the various components which drive managed futures performance found in our 2011 Managed Futures Outlook.

First up, how many markets have seen their volatility increase versus decrease year over year – which has been a very good lagging indicator for whether managed futures were in a good or bad environment (2008 and 2009 being the prime examples)? Surprisingly, with managed futures down for the year, it has been a very good environment for managed futures in this regard – with the majority of markets seeing volatility expansion as compared to 2010 (as measured by the change in the Average True Range).

Next, the average percentage of trending days across a proxy portfolio comprised of markets in 5 different sectors (Crude, Soybeans, S&P 500, Dollar Index, 30yr Bonds, and Copper). This too, appears to be showing a beneficial environment for managed futures – with our proxy portfolio trending nearly 50% of the time, yet managed futures aren’t responding?? The red arrow below shows the disconnect.

And finally, a look at whether we appear to be in a giant risk on/risk off trade, or whether commodity markets are moving separately from the US Dollar. This, again, is shaping up to the good for managed futures – with us well off the extreme levels seen in 2009 and early 2010, at a more normal average of about 0.20.

What gives? These three indicators are moving in the right direction and at beneficial levels, yet managed futures as a whole is down slightly for the year. Is it because the trendiness has occurred in the same direction (a sort of carryover from 2010)? Or because, despite the trendiness, there were two sharp reversals (one in March, one in May) which hit programs? Or simply because 6 months does not tell the story for the whole year? We’ve got more questions than answers.

Saturday, July 23, 2011

Options: The Profit Strategy Behind This Oft-Overlooked Investment Tool

By Larry D. Spears

Stock options are a valuable tool for any investor who wants to increase income, maximize returns, and better control risks in his or her stock portfolio.

Yet despite these benefits, few investors make an effort to use - or even understand - options strategies.

If you're among this group of reluctant option traders, it's probably because you're a victim of what I call "The Options Myth," which goes something like this:

"Options aren't for you. Only really sophisticated and experienced investors should consider options. With options, it's all or nothing; you can lose your entire investment. At least with a good stock you know it's not going to zero. If you're wrong, you've always got a chance for a comeback, because you still own something!"

This mantra is chanted to clients by thousands of financial professionals around the world - "advisors" who either don't understand options themselves or view them exclusively as ultra-high-risk. Some mainstream brokerage firms - Edward Jones, for example - refuse to let their account holders trade them.

But the truth is, options can be for you - and they should be, whether you're a go-for-the-gold speculator, an average investor looking to hedge your portfolio against market pullbacks, or a retiree seeking a little extra cash flow from your dividend-paying shares.

Here's a quick primer on the options basics - all the information you need to fully understand what they are, how they work, and why they should be part of your investing arsenal.

First, a little background...

The Growth of the Options Industry

Although the concept has been around for centuries, options as we know them today are barely four decades old.

Initially, options were individual contracts negotiated on a one-to-one basis between buyer and seller. Prices and terms varied substantially, and the underlying assets involved ranged from stocks and real estate to farm crops, metals, and even tulip bulbs.

That changed on April 26, 1973, when the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) first made "listed" stock options available. "Listing" on a recognized exchange meant that all key aspects of a stock option contract were well defined, with standardized expiration dates and strike prices.

More importantly, it meant a ready market for trading options, with a clearing corporation set up to protect the interests of both the buyer and seller.

Any CBOE member broker anywhere in the country could now take your option order and submit it to the exchange, and it would be matched up with an opposite order from somewhere else - no face-to-face contact needed. Commissions, though quite high by today's online standards, also became reasonable, compared to earlier days when so-called "put and call brokers" had to negotiate every aspect of an option trade.

Listed options turned out to be a huge success. Annual volume mushroomed from under two million contracts in 1973 to nearly 100 million in 1980.

Today, the Options Industry Council (OIC) estimates nearly 300 million options trade every day, with more than 3.6 billion contracts having changed hands last year. Options trade on nearly 40 exchanges worldwide, with more than a dozen electronic trading venues - eight in the U.S. alone.

Of course, those numbers are pretty meaningless if you don't really know what an option is or how it works, so let's get back to the basics.

Understanding Stock Options

For starters, an option is defined as a type of derivative contract that gives its holder the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell an underlying financial asset at a specified price during a set period of time or on a specific date.

(NOTE: Most standardized options are so-called "American" options, meaning they can be exercised at any time prior to the expiration date. But there are also "European" options, which can be exercised only on the expiration date.)

The underlying assets that have "listed" options include more than 2,600 individual stocks (in 100-share lots), exchange-traded funds (ETFs), broad market indexes and specific market sectors (these are usually what are known as "cash-settled" options), currencies, interest-rate instruments, commodity and financial futures, and even some physical commodities like precious metals.

Regardless of the asset underlying an option, however, there are just two basic types:
  • A CALL option gives its owner the right (but, again, not the obligation) to BUY a specific underlying asset at a designated price for a limited period of time. For example, a January 30 WFC call option would give its purchaser the right to buy 100 shares of Wells Fargo & Co. (NYSE:WFC) common stock (the underlying asset) at a price of $30 per share (the strike price) at any time between the date of purchase and the option's stated expiration date (in this case, January 21, 2011), no matter where WFC's trading at that time. (The "30" refers to the price, $30, and is not part of the January date. I'll explain in a moment why it expires January 21.)
  • A PUT option gives its owner the right to SELL a specific underlying asset at a designated price for a limited period of time. For example, a February 15 DELL put option would give its holder the right to sell 100 shares of Dell Inc. (NasdaqGS:DELL) common stock at a price of $15 per share at any time between the date of purchase and the option's stated expiration date (in this case, February 19, 2011).
  • Both puts and calls have three general identifying features:
  • The underlying asset: As a derivative, an option must first be identified by the asset from which it derives its value - e.g., in the first instance above, 100 shares of Wells Fargo common stock.
  • The "strike" price: Also called the "exercise" price or the "striking" price, this is the price at which the option can be exercised. In other words, it is the price at which a call holder has the right to buy the underlying asset or a put owner has the right to sell it. In the second example above, the strike price is $15 per share, meaning the put holder can sell 100 shares of Dell stock at that price any time prior to February 19, 2011. The intervals between strike prices vary from $1.00 for lower-priced and some actively traded mid-range stocks, to $2.50 for moderately traded issues, and $5.00 for higher-priced shares.
  • The expiration date: This is the date after which an option can no longer be exercised to buy or sell the underlying asset (and thus ceases to exist). In the United States, listed stock options normally stop trading on the third Friday of the expiration month (and officially expire the following day). Listed options trade on primary cycles with expiration occurring every three months - e.g., Cycle 1 options expire on the third Friday in January, April, July, and October. However, the most popular stocks also have shorter-term "serial" options that expire on the third Friday of the intervening months. A few very heavily traded stocks even have options that expire weekly.
  • (NOTE: Check out the "option chains" for WFC, DELL, and many other stocks on Google Finance or Yahoo! Finance to get a better idea of the range of strike prices and expiration dates for current listed stock options. Yahoo also has a special section in its "Options Center" that can help you learn to read option symbols - they tend to look, at first glance, like a random string of numbers and letters.)

Stock Option Appraisal

The final element in understanding options is how their prices - or "premiums" - are determined, as well as some of the factors that cause those premiums to change over the life of the option.

To begin with, option premiums are made up of two parts - "intrinsic value" (or "real value") and "time value."

All options have time value. But only "in-the-money" options have intrinsic value - which is the actual difference between the option's exercise price and the current market price of the stock. Thus, call options have intrinsic value only when the current stock price is above the option's exercise price, and put options have intrinsic value only when the current stock price is below the option strike price.

For example, if Wells Fargo stock was priced at $30.75, and the January 30 call listed above had a premium of $2.45, then the call would have an intrinsic value of 75 cents ($30.75 stock price - $30.00 call strike price = $0.75). The rest of its premium - $1.70 ($2.45 - $0.75 = $1.70) - represents time value. On the other hand, if Wells Fargo stock was priced at $29.05 and the January 30 call had a price of $1.35, then the entire option premium would be time value.

In the first instance, the buyer of a January 30 WFC call would need the price of Wells Fargo stock to rise to $32.45 (the strike price plus the premium paid for the call) on the expiration date to break even. At any level above that, he or she would profit. At any Wells Fargo price between $30.00 and $32.45, the call buyer would suffer a partial loss of the $245 ($2.45 premium x 100 shares) he paid for the option. At any WFC price below the call's $30.00 striking price, he would suffer a total loss. However, $245 would be the most he could lose, regardless of how far Wells Fargo stock fell below $30.00.

In the real-life case presented second, the buyer of the January 30 WFC call would need the price of the stock to climb above $31.35 to make a profit, would suffer a partial loss at a stock price between $30.00 and $31.35, and would lose the entire $135 he paid at any WFC price below $30.00 a share.

In the case of the put option, if DELL stock was priced at $13.75 and the February 15 put had a premium of $2.90 - meaning it was in the money (ITM) - then the put would have an intrinsic value of $1.25 ($15.00 put strike price - $13.75 stock price = $1.25). The rest of its premium - $1.65 ($2.90 - $1.25 = $1.65) - would be time value. By contrast, if Dell's stock was priced at $15.30 - meaning the put was out of the money (OTM) - and it had a price of $1.55, then the entire option premium would be time value.

The buyer of the put in the ITM scenario would need the price of Dell stock to fall to $12.10 to break even ($15.00 - $2.90 = $12.10). He would suffer a partial loss at any price between $15.00 and $12.10. And he would suffer a total loss at any price above $15.00, but would profit at any Dell price below $12.10. In the OTM case, Dell would have to fall to $13.45 for the put buyer to break even, but he would profit at any lower price, though he'd suffer a total loss at any level above the put's $15.00 strike price.

The intrinsic value of an option is absolute. It always represents the difference between an in-the-money option's strike price and the actual stock price.

By contrast, time value changes constantly. It's based on an assortment of factors, ranging from the volatility of the underlying security and the market as a whole to the degree by which the option is in or out of the money and - most importantly - the amount of time remaining until expiration.

As a rule, the basic equation in option pricing is "the more time, the more time value." As such, options are considered to be "wasting assets," meaning their value (and price) drops as they approach expiration.

It is this erosion of time value that motivates most sellers of stock options. They hope the options they sell will wind up out-of-the-money (OTM) on the exercise date and thus expire worthless, allowing them to keep the entire premium they received for selling the option (or part of it, if the option is only slightly ITM).

Outright buyers of stock options are, of course, hoping for the opposite result - a move in the price of the underlying stock by expiration sufficient to cover the premium they paid for the option and give them a nice profit, to boot.

Their primary motivations in buying options are the absolutely limited risk of such trades and the high degree of leverage they provide.

For example, in the Wells Fargo trade, the call buyer controlled $2,905 worth of stock for more than two months at a cost of just $135. That was also his maximum risk of loss. Yet his profit was theoretically unlimited - and his potential return was truly phenomenal.

To illustrate, if WFC's stock price climbed to $36.00 a share, the option buyer made a profit of $465 on the trade, giving him a return of 344.4% ($465/$135 = 344.4%). If WFC stayed below $30.00 a share, he lost just $135. A stock buyer, on the other hand, had $2,905 at risk. So she would have made $695 on a rise in the price to $36.00 a share, but her return would have been just 23.9% ($695/$2,905 = 23.9%). And her loss could have been as much as $2,905, had Wells Fargo stock plunged to zero.

The advantages to the option buyer are clear, but with time-value erosion always working against him, the outright purchase of options can only be considered a stark speculation.

However, as mentioned at the beginning, there are a couple of dozen other option strategies that have substantial added benefits and far more acceptable risk/reward scenarios.

So watch for future Money Morning strategy pieces on how to make options an integral part of your investment program.

Follow Us