Tuesday, March 8, 2011

US Cattle Slaughter Higher Than Last Year

by TheCattleSite News Desk

US cattle slaughter for the week ending 5 March was reported at 643,000 head, 1.3 per cent lower than the previous week but still 3.6 per cent higher than a year ago, and hog slaughter for the week was reported at 2.140 million head, 1.5 per cent higher than the previous week but still about 1 per cent lower than a year ago, write Steve Meyer and Len Steiner.

The composition of the weekly slaughter is reported by USDA with a two week lag but our estimates indicate that for the latest slaughter week, steer and heifer slaughter was 508,000 head, 5.4 per cent higher than the previous year.

Cow and bull slaughter, on the other hand, is estimated at 135,000 head, 2.9 per cent lower than a year ago, with cow slaughter estimated at 123,000 head, 3 per cent lower than a year ago. The chart below illustrates the trend in US weekly cow slaughter so far this year. Slaughter rates are down compared to where they were last fall but so far cow slaughter remains well above five year average levels. Indeed, we estimate that for the week ending 5 March, US cow slaughter was sill about 10 per cent over the 2006-10 average for the comparable week. Cattle supplies in the US remain very tight despite the recent increases in fed cattle slaughter.

Feedlots have responded to record out front cattle prices by placing more cattle on feed but the feeder supply is one of the tightest on record. If anything, poor winter wheat grazing and high cattle prices simply shifted the placement trends and we suspect placing more cattle on feed this spring and summer will be more challenging. Given the smaller cow herd and the smallest calf crop in half a century, it will become increasingly difficult to find enough feeders. And unless we stem the flow of cull cows in the marketplace, that situation will not be remedied for the foreseeable future. Yes, feeder cattle prices are up, which should encourage producers to hold on to their cows but so is the price of cull cows.

The latest data we have seen shows prices for live breaking cows up 41 per cent from a year ago while boning cow prices are running some 36 per cent ahead of last year’s levels. High cow prices are a reflection of tight supplies of lean processing beef, high overall beef prices and escalating prices for feeder cattle. 

Despite the year over year reduction in hog slaughter, pork production has been trending higher due to much heavier hog carcasses coming to market. Weights fort the latest reported week were pegged at 208 pounds, 2.5 per cent higher than a year ago. Sow slaughter has trended modestly higher in recent weeks but it remains below year ago levels. For the week ending 5 March we estimate sow slaughter at 59,500 head, down 4 per cent from year ago.


See the original article >>

Corn And Soybean Stocks

by TheCattleSite News Desk

US - The USDA will release two important reports on March 31. These are the Prospective Plantings and March 1 Grain Stocks reports writes Darrel Good, Agricultural Economist, University of Illinois.

There has been less discussion of the estimate of March 1 estimate of grain stocks. Expectations for very small inventories of corn and soybeans at the end of the current marketing year put additional importance on the mid-year stocks estimate. The estimates provide an opportunity to evaluate the pace of consumption that can be supported during the last half of the 2010-11 marketing year. Forming expectations about the level of March 1 inventories is limited due to incomplete data on the consumption categories that are reported on a weekly or monthly basis and the lack of any ongoing estimates of feed and residual use of corn. Following is our calculations for the likely level of March 1 soybean and corn stocks.

For the December through February quarter of the current marketing year, the Census Bureau has reported estimates of the domestic soybean crush for December and January. Crush in those two months was 11.2 per cent less than in the same period last year. The February crush will be reported on March 24. A continuation of the rate of decline reported in December and January would result in a quarterly crush of 438.8 million bushels. We anticipate a smaller decline in February, with the quarterly crush near 442 million bushels.

The USDA’s weekly export inspections estimate indicated that 558.6 million bushels of soybeans were exported in the December 2010 through February 2011 quarter of the marketing year. Adjusting for Census Bureau export estimates that are available only through December 2010, quarterly exports were likely near 571.4 million bushels.

The large level of residual use of soybeans, reported in the first quarter of the marketing year suggests that second quarter seed, feed and residual use should be near zero. These estimates of quarterly soybean consumption point to a March 1 inventory of about 1.265 billion bushels, very near the level of inventories of a year earlier.

For corn, the USDA’s weekly export inspections report reveals exports of 385 million bushels during the second quarter of the marketing year. Adjusting for Census Bureau export estimates in December, quarterly exports were likely near 410 million bushels. Weekly estimates of ethanol production suggest that corn used for ethanol production during the second quarter of the marketing year was 11.5 per cent larger than use of a year earlier, point to a use of 1.25 billion bushels. The use of corn for other food and industrial purposes during the quarter was likely near 350 million bushels bring total food and industrial use near 1.6 billion bushels.

For the year, the USDA projects feed and residual use of corn at 5.2 billion bushels, 60 million bushels (about 1.2 per cent) more than used last year. Use during the first quarter was calculated to be 72 million larger than use during the same quarter last year. If the USDA projection for the year is correct, use during the last three quarters of the year will be near the use of last year. Second quarter use last year was estimated at 1.354 billion bushels. Use near that level this year would near that 65.6 per cent of marketing year feed and residual use of corn occurred in the first half of the year. That would be a very typical distribution prior to the anomaly in 2008-09 and 2009-10.

Total use of corn during the second quarter of the marketing year of 3.369 billion bushels would point to March 1 inventory of 6.644 billion bushels, 1.05 billion smaller than the inventory of a year earlier.

There appears to be considerable uncertainty about the likely level of March 1 corn stocks. The surprisingly large September 1, 2010 stocks estimate for corn continues to raise questions about the counting of old crop and new crop stocks on September 1 and the implication for feed and residual use during the last quarter of the 2009 marketing year and the first quarter of the 2010 marketing year. In retrospect, however, it was really the June 1, 2010 stocks estimate that was on outlier. The September 1, 2010 stocks estimate now appears to be reasonable and logical and should not influence the expectation for the March 1 estimate of stocks. Some have also pointed to the ease of sourcing corn from producers at a relatively weak basis as evidence that corn stocks are more abundant than expected. However, stocks should not be tight in the middle of the marketing year and producers may be reacting to price level more than the magnitude of the basis. In addition while basis levels are not especially strong, the carry in the futures market from March to July is much smaller than the previous three years. Small carry discourages storage.

See the original article >>

China's soybean imports to set record in 2011-12

by Agrimoney.com

Growth in China's imports of soybeans is to slow next season – but not by much, boosted by falling domestic crop and a growing need for animal feed, US officials said, in a report casting doubt on talk of a cut in import tariffs.
The world's biggest soybean importer will buy in 58.0m tonnes of the oilseed in 2011-12, some 5.5% more than in the current season, US Department of Agriculture attaches in Beijing said.
While representing a slowdown on the pace of growth in 2010-11, the figure would set a record, and keep the pressure on supplies from America, the top soybean exporter.
Indeed, the attaches forecast that China's soybean imports from America would reach 27.0m tonnes (992m bushels) next season, a rise of 2.0m tonnes (73.5m bushels) – more than the US is currently expecting its production to rise by.
As an extra sign of the pressure facing US stocks, the attaches' estimated that China would import 25.0m tonnes of American soybeans in 2010-11, a figure 1.0m tonnes higher than the official USDA estimate, which will be updated on Thursday in the department's latest flagship Wasde report on world crop supply and demand.
Consolidation boost 
The attaches attributed their upbeat estimates to the strong demand for both soybean products – soyoil, for which consumption is being directly boosted by Chinese consumers' growing wealth, and soybean meal, which is feeling the demand indirectly, through a growing appetite for meat.
The growing demand for meat is spurring the consolidation of livestock producers into industrial enterprises keener to buy soymeal than small-time farmers.
"The Chinese animal production sector is implementing structural changes which will positive impact protein meal feed demands," the attaches said in a report, quoting official data that two-thirds of hog farms were of a size to slaughter more than 50 animals a year, compared with 37% in 2005.
"Soybean imports will show steady growth in the foreseeable future because of the strong and growing demand for protein meals and vegetable oils."
Soybeans vs corn and cotton 
However, domestic farmers were to put less ground to soybeans this season, preferring grains, which attract greater levels of government support, and higher value horticultural crops.
"The profit from soybeans is estimated at $600 per hectare, compared with $600-1,000 per hectare for corn," the briefing said.
In eastern Chinese provinces, such as Hebei and Shandong, "soybean planting areas is expected to lose ground to cotton and corn", and to fall 10% in neighbouring Henan.
The report added that soybean growers' "competitiveness continues to be undercut by low yields and poor efficiency", with a lack of crop rotation believed to be keeping yields at a little over half US levels of 3 tonnes per hectare.
Too soon for tariff cut?
The attaches also proposed that China would not imminently lower tariffs on soybeans and soyoil from 9% to 3% - speculation over which lifted Chicago prices of both commodities last week – despite the help such a reduction might be in the battle against food price inflation.
"The agriculture sectors and governments in the major soybean producing provinces are likely to challenge this proposal, and it remains unclear whether the government would approve a proposed tariff rate cut at this moment," the report said.
"Reducing tariffs to lower prices could appease consumer angst about rising food prices, but a 3% tariff... is unlikely to impact the current large volume of trade.
"Facing a growing supply and demand gap for oilseeds, the government is likely to maintain the current trade and industry development policy in 2011-12.

See the original article >>

Hidden Inflation: Rising Prices Are Hitting Consumers Harder Than the Fed Will Admit


Kerri Shannon writes: Any U.S. consumer that goes to the grocery store or the gas station on a regular basis knows that prices are rising. 

Unfortunately, those rising prices are set to soar even higher - and their effects on consumers will continue to be ignored by the U.S. Federal Reserve. 

The United States has had a break from inflation the past couple years, while it exported higher prices to emerging market economies. The Fed's easy money policies created excess money that flowed overseas, and now those countries are seeing prices rise to threatening levels. 

Recent reports indicate U.S. inflation is also headed for an upswing. Money growth in the United States is up to worrying levels, oil prices have risen over $100 a barrel and continue to climb, and commodities prices continue to surge.

"[H]owever successful the Fed has been in exporting inflation since 2008, its success won't last for much longer," Money Morning Contributing Editor Martin Hutchinson said earlier this year. "At some point in 2011, inflation will be re-imported - and probably with a roar rather than a whisper." 

The consumer price index (CPI) for January released by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) showed prices for all items except food and energy, also known as core inflation, were up 1% in January from a year prior.

But what core inflation isn't showing are the dangerous effects of hidden inflation, inflation that has not yet seeped into the core numbers - and could potentially drag down an already tepid economic recovery.

Hidden Inflation: What the Core Misses

Hidden inflation is digging into wallets and savings accounts, in the form of rising food costs and energy prices.
U.S. policymakers omit food and fuel costs from their core inflation calculation because they believe the two prices are subject to volatility and that core inflation is more indicative of underlying inflation trends.

But prices in these sectors are soaring higher. 

The total price index including food and fuel - also known as headline inflation - was up 1.6% in January from a year earlier. 

Price increases of energy and food accounted for two-thirds of the overall index jump. The food index has risen 1.8% over the last 12 months, the energy index is up 7.3% and the gasoline index is up 13.4%.

Recent research from Credit Suisse Group AG (NYSE ADR: CS) indicated "the common global concern of the moment is commodity price inflation."

And U.S. consumers are feeling the effects of these rising costs, despite the Fed's lack of attention to them.
More than 12% of after-tax income in U.S. households is now being spent on fuel and food, according to a CNBC report. 

Even if prices have changed little for some items, consumers are getting less for their money than in years past, because they're paying the same price for a smaller rolls of toilet paper or fewer crackers in a package.

An example of official inflation numbers ignoring the effects of food prices is The Economist's Big Mac Index. It compares the global prices of one of McDonald's Corp.'s (NYSE: MCD) signature sandwiches to a country's reported inflation. The fast food chain's menu items rise in price along with food, rent, wages and materials, as restaurants pass along costs to customers. 

The results showed Big Mac prices rose more than the reported inflation in many countries over the past 10 years. Argentina's burger inflation was up 19%, while its official inflation rate was only 10%. China burger prices were up 3.7% against the 10-year inflation rate of 2.3%, for a difference of 1.4%, about the same in the U.S. burger-to-inflation comparison. 

Higher priced commodities are already pushing up the prices of many retail food items. The consumer price index for food at home posted its largest increase in two years in January by rising 0.7%, with all six major grocery store food group indexes rising. 

The rising costs of commodities are creating a ripple effect through the food industry. In one of the most dramatic price surges, corn hit a 30-month high in January. Because corn is used as livestock feed, its price climb has pushed up the price of many meats. 

Pork is up 12% from a year ago, beef is up 6% and poultry 2%, according to Michael Swanson, an agricultural economist at Wells Fargo & Co. (NYSE: WFC). 

"Either the hog guy is going to go out of business or you're going to pay more for pork," Swanson told The Wall Street Journal. So if you "want barbecue ribs, you're going to have an extra $10 attached to it."

Cereal prices are inching higher due to wheat costs, and packaged and canned coffee is climbing since coffee bean prices jumped 77% last year. 

Commodity prices are affecting more than just food. Cotton futures surged 92% in 2010, due to growing demand and supply constraints from floods in Pakistan and heavy rains in China. Higher cotton prices hurt consumers who buy clothing, sheets and towels. Retail prices of jeans are expected to rise 4.3% this year, sweatshirts/sweatpants 2.4% and T-shirts 1.8%, according to Cotton Inc. 

Inflation has also hit housing budgets. Real estate development executives are predicting double-digit rent increases in the years ahead due to an increasing population of renters and a limited supply of housing units. 

U.S. factory operators also have felt the price pinch. Raw materials costs in January reached their highest level since July 2008.

Even if rising prices haven't yet affected core inflation statistics, they are hurting consumers by making it more difficult to buy apparel, housing and transportation. With gasoline prices expected to approach - if not top - $4.00 a gallon this year, there won't be much money left in household budgets to maintain spending levels needed to drive the U.S. economic recovery.

Consumers Lose Purchasing Power

Some consumers facing higher prices at stores are also dealing with less income. 

Those relying on Social Security benefits haven't seen a cost of living adjustment (COLA) in two years. The COLA is based on increases in the CPI for urban wage earners (CPI-W) from the third quarter of the prior year to the third quarter of the current year. 

In 2009, Social Security beneficiaries received a 5.8% increase because of a spike in energy prices in 2008's third quarter. The next year there was no COLA because the CPI-W decreased from the third quarter 2008 to the third quarter 2009. 

Last year, however, prices were up 1.5% in the comparable time periods. But the COLA remained zero for the nearly 58 million people receiving benefits because prices did not rise as high as they did in 2008. 

As consumer prices keep climbing, Social Security beneficiaries are taking in the same amount of money - and household budgets are continually strained. 

The Congressional Budget Office is projecting a small 0.4% increase in 2012. 

Advocates for citizens relying on Social Security benefits claim the CPI-W doesn't adequately take into account the most costly expenses for older Americans, like medical care and housing. 

"The existing COLA formula does not account for the economic reality of the true costs that most seniors faced," Fernando Torres-Gil, director of the University of California, Los Angeles Center for Policy Research on Aging, told the Associated Press.

U.S. Policies Will Fuel Fire

U.S. policy makers continue to downplay concerns about rising prices. 

U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke told the Senate Banking Committee last week that climbing commodity prices would likely affect consumers, but that effect will be "temporary and relatively modest."
"My sense is that the increases we've seen so far -- while tough for many people -- do not yet pose a significant risk to the overall recovery," said Bernanke. 

The Fed continues to maintain policies that encourage economic growth by keeping interest rates near zero and buying Treasury bonds. But critics of these policies say the central bank's short-term focus is dangerously blind to future inflationary dangers. 

"My concern is that the cost of the Fed's current monetary policy - the money creation and massive balance-sheet expansion - will come to outweigh the perceived short-term benefits," said House Budget Committee Chairman Rep. Paul Ryan, R-WI.

Foreign leaders have voiced increasing concerns over global inflation and have asked the Fed to look beyond the core numbers.

European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet said last week that the ECB is looking to raise interest rates next month for the first time in almost three years to combat rising inflation. 

"Strong vigilance is warranted," said Trichet. 

Trichet has warned before that core inflation isn't always the best indicator of future rising prices.
"In the U.S., the Fed considers that core inflation is a good predictor for future headline inflation," Trichet said in an interview with The Journal. But elsewhere around the world, "core inflation is not necessarily a good predictor." 

Some U.S. policymakers are starting to admit the Fed's policies might soon warrant adjustment to curb climbing prices. Richmond Federal Reserve Bank President Jeffrey Lacker said businesses are starting to complain of rising costs squeezing profit margins. 

"They're not able to pass on those cost increases [to consumers] now but they expect to be able to, some of them, in the later part of this year," said Lacker. "If that were to happen that could push the inflation rate up over a broad range of prices and that would be a very worrying concern for a central banker."

Inflation fears are already spreading from consumers to the markets. U.S. Treasuries have been falling and yields pushed higher on inflation concerns. Fixed-income investments like Treasuries lose value with inflation and worried investors are retreating from the once safe-haven bonds. 

Bill Gross, manager of the world's biggest bond fund at Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), said in a Bloomberg radio interview last week that headline inflation gains are more worrisome than Bernanke suggests. Gross said rising oil prices could trim U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) growth by a quarter to half a percentage point. 

"Bernanke tends to think this doesn't matter - at least in terms of headline versus the core - we do," said Gross. 

Even a small rise in prices could hurt the two-year bull market as consumers lose confidence when faced with inflation on top off a bucket of other concerns, like poor state and local governments, reduced spending by the federal government and possible tax cut expirations in years to come.

Concerns will only worsen if the U.S. central bank continues to ignore the warnings. Money Morning's Hutchinson said this current bout of inflation will be around for a while, much like in the 1970s when rising prices and high unemployment combined to form a period of stagflation. 

"[W]e can expect inflation to be with us for several years this time, too," said Hutchinson. "In fact, expect it to get worse for the next three to four years, while Ben S. Bernanke remains at the helm of the nation's central bank."

[Editor's Note: If investors have to now worry about the "I-word" - inflation - they're also going to have to worry about the "R-word" - retirement.

Here's the problem: The longer you work, the more you can save - and the longer the rampant inflation we're expecting will have to work on your nest egg.

But here's the solution: Boost your rates of return.


See the original article >>

Silver Going Parabolic, Time to Sell and Reinvest in Gold


Kenny Rogers may not be widely known as a great philosopher, but one of his legendary songs carried a message well worth knowing. It goes, "Know when to hold them, and know when to fold them." Last week in the game of world monetary poker, the ECB raised the limit. Now the Federal Reserve will have to demonstrate it has what it takes to play poker with the big boys. Question is not if it will fold, but when it will fold. June or sooner?

Reuters reported on the statement by ECB president Jean-Claude Trichet concerning the likelihood of the ECB raising rates at the April meeting(reuters.com,3 Mar 2011),
"I would also say that we are mentioning that we are in a posture of strong vigilance and my understanding is that the position of the governing council is that an increase in interest rates at the next meeting is possible"
Consequence of that statement has been a massive bear raid on the dollar, as market participants call the ECB's bet and wait for Federal Reserve to reflect on its hand.

ECB, in anticipating the raising of rates, is not advocating anything particularly radical. Driving the car while looking through the front windshield has always been considered both appropriate and standard. Same is true for the "driving" of monetary policy. Central banks are charged with managing the future, not to be constantly in the process of correcting their previous mistakes.

U.S. Federal Reserve has rarely, if ever, understood that the task is the future, not the mistakes of the past. For nearly two decades, the primary mission of the Federal Reserve has been to provide low cost money to Wall Street. Beranke and his Lap Dogs, one, continue to deny that the massive financial problems of the past decade were a direct consequence of free money, and, two, continue to pursue their policy of free money for speculators.

Free money may benefit speculators, but it does little directly for those seeking to make an honest living. U.S. equity market, as measured by the S&P 500, has risen at a compound rate of about 39% over the past two years. Is that consequence of U.S. economic conditions improving at that speed? No, it, and other speculative markets, have risen because of the Federal Reserve's policy of providing unlimited free money to speculators.

In each of the Federal Reserves speculative bubbles, some individual markets standout as the epicenters of the money binge. Internet stocks were once one. Junk mortgages were another. Today, Silver market is perhaps the center of today's speculative binge. In the chart that follows, historical price history of $Silver is portrayed. That red arrow indicates the outline of the parabolic formation in which it has been moved.

Silver is quite clearly in a speculative bubble. Bubbles are manias that become financed with debt. As most of the trading in Silver is of the paper variety in the form of derivatives, it qualifies as a bubble. Fantasies can indeed be created and imaginary conspiracies can be concocted, but the test of reality can not be permanently denied. If it walks like a duck, quacks line a duck, and looks like a duck, then odds favor it being a duck.

Parabolic moves, such as in Silver above, are dangerous formations as they defy financial gravity. The slope of that curve increases as it rises. It is as if we threw a ball into the air, and the higher the ball goes the faster it rises, in denial of physical gravity. Reality is that in the case of both physical gravity and financial gravity, ultimately down becomes the path of least resistance.
We know several things about parabolic curves.
One, they always end. Da moon is never a reasonable price target.
Two, we never know in advance when they will end. Better to unload the truck before it is repossessed along with what it carries.
Third, the pain created when they fail is excruciating. Breakfast is more pleasant for the chicken than the hog.
Fourth, they create great opportunities after failure. Auctions of repossessed merchandise are often good times to buy.
For more than a decade we have been doing valuation work on Gold and Silver. While certainly not perfect, that effort has served well as a guide to investing in that period. And yes, any method that also always said buy Gold and Silver would have worked well also.

Valuation, either under or over, never makes a market go up or down. It is, however, most often a precursor of the future direction of a market. And yes, we prefer the role of the chicken at breakfast. Results of that valuation are in the table that follows.

Gold is today the preferred precious metal when compared to Silver. That might not, and likely will not, prevent it from going down when the Federal Reserve folds in June. That June time period is becoming of increasing importance. The current era of free money, quantitative easing, by the Federal Reserve is scheduled to end in June. Should the ECB raise rates in April, Federal Reserve will come under increasing pressure to abandon free money policy.

Free money has been driving financial markets. Should that era of free money begin to end in June, considerable realignment of investment market values seems likely. Silver is simply the most obvious one. Deferring the investment of idle funds, and perhaps taking some profits, might be wise until the June poker hand has been played. The chicken will still be around in July.

See the original article >>

OIL/EQUITIES INVERSION CONTINUES….

by Cullen Roche

Another interesting overnight session is unfolding as equity futures surge higher and oil prices retreat 1.5%.  Rumors in Libya are flying fast and furious these days.  The one thing that is certain is that the equity markets appear to be hostage to the oil markets.  This evening’s decline in oil prices is providing some relief to equity prices.

The more interesting occurrence might actually be the 1% decline in copper prices.   I don’t want to read too much into one night of action, but the divergence in copper and oil has been most obvious in the last month since oil prices began surging and investors started selling copper due to economic growth concerns.  A continuing decline in copper prices (regardless of the action in oil) would not bode well for equities going forward….

See the original article >>

Follow Us