Thursday, June 6, 2013

13-year cycle about to turn the market around again?

by Chris Kimble

CLICK ON CHART TO ENLARGE

What does the 1974 low, 1987 crash and 2000 dot.com highs have in common?  They are some of the most important highs/lows in the past 40 years and they are 13-years apart!

13-years from the 2000 high is 2013! Will this 13-year cycle influence the markets with the Dow hitting dual resistance lines from 1987 and 2000 coming into play right now???

One of my favorite quotes is...."It's not the odds of something happening, its the impact if it does!"

Odds may be low that this 13-year cycle impacts the markets this year...if it does, the impact could be big since Margin debt levels are into the DANGER ZONE again! (See Margin debt)  First time margin debt levels were the highest in history? 13-years ago!!!

Stay tuned to see if the 13-year cycle has an influence this year!

See the original article >>

This pattern could really be bearish and stink for small caps!

by Chris Kimble

CLICK ON CHART TO ENLARGE

Shared the above chart on Stocktwits yesterday (see post here).

The Russell 2000 is up against a resistance line that has been important since the 2009 financial crisis and has formed a bearish rising wedge, which is breaking down.

This pattern could really end up stinking for small caps and could spill over into the broad markets!

See the original article >>

Will Market Swoon After The May Rally?

By George Leong

May was supposed to a dud, according to the Stock Trader’s Almanac. In 2012, the month of May was a disaster, with the Dow and the S&P 500 plummeting 6.21% and 6.23%, respectively. The technology and small-cap sectors fared even worse, with the NASDAQ and Russell 2000 giving up 7.19% and 6.74%, respectively, in May 2012.

Fast-forward a year, and this May has been blooming for the stock market. The key stock indices recorded excellent gains, with the NASDAQ staging its best month in over a year.

The reality is that in spite of several days of selling in mid-April, the current upward move in the stock market this year really hasn’t faced any hurdles, which is a surprise.

In fact, we have yet to see sustained selling or a down month this year, with the exception of the 0.42% decline posted by the Russell 2000 in April. Small-caps came back with a vengeance in May, advancing nearly five percent.

And there will likely be more highs and records in the stock market to come as long as the Federal Reserve and other global central banks continue offering easy money and driving down interest rates. And if 2012 is any indication, it’s looking like full steam ahead.

In 2012, the stock market staged a strong rally following the May meltdown, reporting gains in each month from June to September.

Now, I’m not totally convinced this pattern will happen again this year, but the investment climate as far as the economy and easy money is better than it was in 2012.

The only thing that concerns me is that I just don’t see the current rate of the stock market advance keeping pace. If this were to happen, the Dow would end up with a 41% gain, while the S&P 500 would have advanced 38%. Honestly, I don’t see this happening, which means we could likely see some hesitancy over the next several months—or at least a stock market correction of some meaningful magnitude.

I would view a stock market correction not as a red flag, but as a buying opportunity to jump in and accumulate additional positions. My belief is that this stock market is heading higher.

The only thing that could derail the bull market is the Fed, especially if it decides to pare down its bond buying, which would force longer-term yields higher.

In addition, I’m concerned about the bubble-like conditions in the Japanese stock market, where I feel stocks are extremely vulnerable to more selling. (Read “Why Nikkei Sell-Off May Foreshadow Things to Come.”)

Since trading at a high on May 22, the benchmark Nikkei index has faltered 10.7% and has breached its 50-day moving average, as shown in the chart below, based on my technical analysis.

Tokyo Nikkei Average Chart

Chart courtesy of www.StockCharts.com

What concerns me in Japan is the lack of solid buying following the 7.3% correction on May 23. Of course, Japan’s situation is vastly different from the U.S., since Japanese stocks were up 70% in just six months.

See the original article >>

Hog, cattle exports weak; trade anticipates demand data

By Rich Nelson

Sharing Services 0

Hogs: Though futures had a quiet day on Wednesday, we will note the April pork trade figures caused some discussions. The new figures released in the morning showed pork exports at 397 million lbs. Compared with last year, that was down 12%. We call that an improvement from the March numbers that were 18% lower. In addition, these numbers were made even with terrible exports to China and Russia (-39% and -99%, respectively). The trade will assume a slightly better-than-expected pace in April will also mean a slightly better-than-expected pace right now.

In shorter-term issues, we still have not seen that transition point yet where packers note cash hog prices have pushed too far compared with cash pork. That point certainly may come, but is not here yet. In beef, supply is a clear negative. In pork, it is the exact opposite. One thing both sides do share though is their hopes/concerns regarding consumer demand. Friday’s report on employment may shed a little more light on that subject…Rich Nelson

Cattle: Packers took a hard stance Wednesday with $121 bids posted in the morning. Compared with last week’s $124 trading, that would appear as though $1 lower trade this week is an easy assumption. That may have disappointed those looking for steady prices. Cattle feeders are asking $125. As there is generally a $2 drop from initial cattle feeder asking prices and actual trade, that would mean they are also ready to accept lower prices.

Wednesday morning’s release of April U.S. beef trade numbers may have been the reason. April U.S. beef exports, at 180 million lbs. were 13% lower than last year. That was down from the March numbers that were 3% under last year. Keep in mind these numbers were made with zero exports to Russia.

On the import side, we brought in 232 million lbs. in April. That was 9% over last year (March was 3% under). Sending out smaller amounts of exports and taking in more imports means more beef left in the U.S. for consumers.

On the wholesale beef end, we must also point out week to date action is $2.25 lower for choice and $2.57 lower for select. We should expect continued declines in cash cattle prices, from the $128 spring high, for at least another two to 12 weeks. We continue to suggest cash will reach down to $113 for the summer low and for August futures to hit $115. The factor that bulls are hoping for here is Friday’s employment report. If it shows another month of good numbers, the trade will adjust its consumer demand expectations a little higher. That could also encourage us to bring our downside targets higher (if it is bullish)…Rich Nelson

See the original article >>

The IMF: Magnanimous

By tothetick

Once upon a time, there was (and still is) the International Monetary Fund. Their story reads something like this. It’s not all make-believe; it actually happens.

It never ceases to amaze that we vote people into positions. Those people that we have voted in elect in turn (or just go ahead and appoint without an election, making it all look very transparent) other people who are not as important but who will have the possibility of choosing (apparently in an “open, merit-based, and transparent manner”) someone who will be more important than they are, but less important than the first person that is in the voting/appointment chain. If it’s getting complicated by now, that’s the whole point of it. It’s meant to look complicated from the outside, so that we all lose in interest in the last person that’s being appointed in the said chain. Then, we allow that last person to take decisions all around the world, dish out the dough and tell other countries that they have got it all wrong, imposing austerity here and there willy-nilly as if it has been decided over a croissant in some Washington D.C. Hotel. The, to cap it all, that person stands up last night and says something along the lines of: “sorry boys, we went a bit tough on you I guess”. But, hey, the damage is done now, so what are we going to do? The answer is probably little, as usual.

Christine Lagarde announced yesterday in a press statement following an International-Monetary Fund report released on the austerity program offered to Greece in 2010 and 2012, that mistakes had been made. It had failed to see the full extent that austerity would have on the Greek economy. In 2010, they provided 110 billion euros in a loan to keep the Greeks afloat. But, there was an obligation to restore the fiscal balance through the setting up of an austerity program as well as the privatization of state assets (to the tune of 50 billion euros). The privatization of assets took longer than had been planned and structural reforms were not being put into place, so the IMF provided another bailout of 130 billion euros (not all on their own, along with the Eurozone in both instances).

The present situation in Greece is pretty dire. Unemployment stood at 24.4% (2012) and has since increased to 27% in February 2013. That’s a rise from 17.4% from 2011.  Youth unemployment has hit 60% (aged 15-24 years old) and the country is being crippled by the austerity measures. Inflation was -0.6% in April 2013. The national debt of the country stands at more than 381 billion, clocking up more than 50 billion more each year in interest alone. The debt represents 189.19% of GDP today.

Neither the bailout of 2010, nor the one that took place last year to patch the wounds up did very much to help the Greeks out of their predicament. The only thing that the IMF did largely was to enable the setting of the scene to push the Greek people into such a corner that they would elect a far-right fascist party, the Golden Dawn. In 2012, the waning economic bailout measures that were not showing through in Greece resulted in the break-through by the Golden Dawn Party (7% in the elections), who vowed to turf the immigrants out of Greece and make the country good again. Of course, it’s the immigration problem, isn’t it? In Greece 1/5 of the population is from immigration. But, that’s not the problem. Why oh why do we always have to fall back on the scapegoat theory and choose the people that we want to blame for our own mistakes?

The IMF and the European Central Bank may have kept the Greeks in the Eurozone. But, it was at a price. Market confidence has not been restored and unemployment has continued to rise. The poorest in the country were hit and are still being hit the hardest. Of course consumer confidence hasn’t returned in a country where we still talk of ousting them from the Eurozone, and perhaps even the EU. We refer to them as one of the PIGS. Would you fancy being an ‘oinker’ in the family? Would that restore your confidence?

The contraction of the economy of Greece is beyond the IMF’s wildest nightmare-scenario situation. They thought it would contract by just 5.5%. It turns out that it’s more than three times that (17%). Wonderful mathematical wizardry. Calculations are not easy at the best of times, but in times of crisis , they are even harder.

Stories that begin by “one upon a time” are not always for children. The Greeks aren’t children, but the IMF belittled them. The IMF told them they had to do this and that they had to do that; and it was that which brought them down even more. But, they had to be publically punished to make sure that the others that were getting bigger around the world didn’t end up doing the same thing. Who in their right mind would ask the IMF now for money? You would have to be desperate, wouldn’t you? It would only plunge you further into economic disarray. What a botch-job by the IMF. Well done guys. Credibility just went (further) down the pan. What did you expect? But, what’s worse, the Greeks are the ones that are being hit the hardest at the moment. They have just taken another slap in the face from Ms. Lagarde. Isn’t it magnanimous to admit one’s mistakes? Absolution?

See the original article >>

China corn, soy imports to fall short of US hopes

by Agrimoney.com

China's imports of corn will grow over the next decade, but not by as fast as some other commentators believe, being outpaced by those of cheese, and not far ahead of beef, leading economists said.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation, in a much-watched annual outlook on world agriculture, highlighted that China, the world's most populous country, will become increasingly more dependent on food imports.

While annual demand growth will slow to 1.9% over the next decade, from 3.4% over the past 10 years, reflecting the extent of the improvement in diets already achieved, the rate of increase in production will slow too, to 1.7% per annum from 3.2%.

"China's consumption growth will slightly outpace its production growth," the report said.

"The challenge is clear - feeding China in the context of its rapid economic growth and limited resource constraints is a daunting task."

'Environmental stress'

Meeting demand will require large increases in imports of many agricultural commodities, including corn and oilseeds, as China struggles to maintain self-sufficiency in production of pork, its favoured meat.

Producing virtually all of its own pork "will be a challenge" even with a slowdown to 1.6% a year in growth in consumption.

"Management of land and water constraints, for example, will play a major role in China's ability to remain self-sufficient.

"In the next decade, China's pig population will rise to almost 550m head, further stressing the environment, often in areas surrounding cities."

'Strict control'

However, while imports of coarse grains – mainly corn – will more than double to 13.2m tonnes by 2022, that is a far smaller increase than observers including the US Department of Agriculture foresee.

The USDA predicts China's corn imports alone hitting 19.6m tonnes by 2022-23, with barley buy-ins reaching 3.3m tonnes on top.

The FAO and OECD said that annual growth in China's use of coarse grains would slide to 2.1% over the next decade, from 5.2% in the last, "largely because China will exercise strict control over the industrial usage of corn".

"Production of ethanol from maize will remain less than 1.5bn litres."

The groups were, relatively, downbeat on imports of oilseeds too, seeing growth to 82.8m tonnes in 2022 from 65.1m tonnes this year – representing a slump to 2.6% from 13.3% in the annual growth rate.

"Import growth should slow down compared to the last decade, on account of the deceleration in growth of the crushing sector, as demand growth for both protein meal and vegetable oil eases, from a higher base," the report said.

The USDA foresees China's imports of soybeans alone hitting 102.9m tonnes in 2022-23.

Trade prospects for China, as the top buyer of soybeans and prospectively a huge purchaser of corn, are particularly closely watched in grain and oilseed markets.

'Slow down significantly'

The OECD and FAO, which five years ago were among the first to highlight the potential squeeze on food supplies caused by population growth and productivity slowdowns which has fuelled the revival in the agriculture sector, were also downbeat on prospects for China's sugar imports, which they saw stagnating at about 2.5m tonnes a year.

Extra beet and cane plantings, and yield growth, will allow the country to meet most of its increasing demand.

"China's recent import growth should slow down significantly compared to the last decade, and remain below the peak reached in 2011."

Purchases, and production, of cotton will slow too as China's rising labour costs shrink its textiles industry.

"While domestic consumption of textile products is likely to increase, the intensification of competition in cotton spinning products, especially from India and other countries with low-cost labour, the use of cotton in China will decline," the report said.

Diary, beef booms

The FAO and OECD were more upbeat on prospects for dairy imports, with domestic milk production slowing to 2.4% a year, from 6.9% a year over the past decade, behind growth in many milk products.

Consumption increases will be "mostly driven by income levels and the growing influence of multinational companies, which are introducing new retail products and processing efficiencies, as well as government programmes that promote, for example, school milk consumption".

Cheese imports will soar by 10% a year to top 100,000 tonnes in 2022.

Imports of beef will also soar, as China's low consumption rates, of 4 kilogrammes per person per year, catch up with the average in OECD countries of 14 kilogrammes per person per year.

"Bovine meat will become the fastest growing [meat] import sector with a growth rate of 7% per annum."

See the original article >>

Follow Us