Monday, July 18, 2011

S & P: America Could Default Even if Debt Ceiling is Raised

By Washingtons Blog

As I noted yesterday, America could default even if the debt ceiling is raised.
One of the big, government-sponsored American rating agencies has just confirmed my post.

Specifically, Standard & Poor’s announced today:
[We're putting U.S. debt on] CreditWatch with negative implications … owing to the dynamics of the political debate on the debt ceiling, there is at least a one-in-two likelihood that we could lower the long-term rating on the U.S. within the next 90 days ….
The political debate about the U.S.’ fiscal stance and the related issue of the U.S. government debt ceiling has, in our view, only become more entangled.
***
We may lower the long-term rating on the U.S. by one or more notches into the ‘AA’ category in the next three months, if we conclude that Congress and the Administration have not achieved a credible solution to the rising U.S. government debt burden and are not likely to achieve one in the foreseeable future.
The Washington Post adds:
S&P managing director John Chambers said in an interview … even if the parties agree to raise the debt ceiling, it may not be enough to avert a downgrade. Chambers said the country must implement a plan to reduce the annual budget deficit by roughly $4 trillion over 10 years, which makes the debt manageable over the long term.
The White House and Congress have discussed a plan that big, but negotiations have more recently centered on a smaller deal, at $2 trillion or less.
“That could still lead to a downgrade,” Chambers said.
Knee-jerk conservatives may say, “yes, we have to slash all social support programs like unemployment benefits and food stamps”.

Knee-jerk liberals might say “raise taxes instead of cutting any spending”.

And stopping bailouts and giveaways for the top .1% of the richest elite (which weaken rather than strengthen the economy, as shown here, here and here) and slashing spending on unnecessary imperial wars (which reduce rather than increase our national security, as demonstrated here and here) is what the budget really needs.
As I wrote last year:
Why aren’t our government “leaders” talking about slashing the military-industrial complex, which is ruining our economy with unnecessary imperial adventures?
And why aren’t any of our leaders talking about stopping the permanent bailouts for the financial giants who got us into this mess? And see this.
And why aren’t they taking away the power to create credit from the private banking giants – which is costing our economy trillions of dollars (and is leading to a decrease in loans to the little guy) – and give it back to the states?
If we did these things, we wouldn’t have to raise taxes or cut core services to the American people.
I pointed out the next month:
If there’s any shortfall, all we have to do is claw back the ill-gotten gains from the fraudsters working for the too big to fails whose unlawful actions got us into this mess in the first place. See this, this, this, this and this.

Commodities Turn the Corner

by Tom Aspray

Technical indicators suggest that the commodities correction may be over, and now is a good time to establish long positions in select broad-based or more specialized commodity ETFs.

Silver’s sharp reversal in May caused selling in many of the commodity markets, so it was not surprising that Barclay’s Capital estimated that $6.5 billion came out of the commodity markets in May. Further outflows in June means the rate of outflows is almost as much as what moved out of the commodity funds in late 2008.

Of course, this was at the height of the financial crisis. The open interest in many of the individual commodities has also dropped sharply, as fewer are willing to hold long positions. For example, the open interest in coffee and copper were both down over 70%.

On May 5, I suggested that “The Commodity Bull Market Isn’t Over.” At the time, my analysis suggested that “A deeper correction and a significant retracement of the recent gains should be an opportunity to establish either 1) long positions in a broad-based commodity vehicle, or 2) targeted positions in a specific commodity market.”

The commodity markets have firmed over the past two weeks, suggesting that the correction may be over. The added pressure on the US dollar over the widening concern over the debt ceiling is also a positive for the commodity markets, and so too are China’s recent growth numbers.
chart
Click to Enlarge

Chart Analysis: The Reuters CRB Index declined to just below the upper boundary of its weekly trading channel (line a) and the 620 level was briefly broken. The 38.2% support from last summer’s low is at 600 with the 50% level just under 570.
  • The current correction has not lasted quite as long as the one that occurred in early 2010 (see circle), but this one is taking a similar shape
  • There is key weekly resistance at 662.37, and a close above this level will indicate that the correction in commodities is over
  • Once above the previous high at 691, the next upside target is in the 712 area
Elements Rogers Total Return ETN (RJI) was designed to track the global consumption of a basket of 36 commodities. It has 35% in agricultural commodities, 21% in both precious and base metals, and the remaining 44% in energy.
  • RJI peaked on April 8 at $10.51 and dropped to a low of $8.91 on June 24
  • This drop slightly violated the 38.2% support at $9.05 with the 50% support at $8.60
  • Short-term support is now in the $9.25-$9.42 area
  • The daily on-balance volume (OBV) is now testing its declining weighted moving average (WMA) and the downtrend, line e. The weekly OBV (not shown) confirmed the April highs and has held above its rising weighted moving average on the correction
  • Next resistance is at $9.90 and a close above this level should complete the correction

chart
Click to Enlarge

PowerShares DB Commodity Index ETF (DBC) is more narrowly focused than RJI, as it includes the commodities like light sweet crude oil (West Texas Intermediate, or WTI), heating oil, RBOB* gasoline, natural gas, Brent crude, gold, silver, aluminum, zinc, copper grade A, corn, wheat, soybeans, and sugar.
*RBOB: Reformulated Blendstock for Oxygenate Blending. This is the benchmark gasoline product traded on the major commodity exchanges.
  • After peaking at $32.20, DBC dropped below first support (line a) at $28.27 before turning around. It came very close to the daily Starc-band, but held above the stronger support at $27.40, line b
  • The daily OBV held its uptrend, line d, on the recent correction and has moved back above its weighted moving average. It is acting stronger than prices and is very close to its prior highs, line c
  • Weekly OBV has held above its weighted moving average on the correction and could make new highs this week
  • The rally has taken DBC close to the latest high at $30.68 with the daily Starc+ band at $30.89
  • There is further resistance at $31.34 and then at $32.02. The 127.2% retracement resistance target is at $33.10
  • Short-term support is now in the $29.80-$30.20 area and then at $29.40
The Elements Rogers International Agricultural Total Return ETN (RJA) closed below the 38.2% support for two days in the latter part of June, hitting a low of $9.76 before rebounding sharply.
  • The daily downtrend (line e) is at $10.64 with further resistance in the $10.90-$11.10 area. Once above the early-2011 highs at $11.95, the 127.2% Fibonacci target is at $12.55.
  • The daily OBV has broken its steep downtrend, line f, as volume has increased on the rally. The weekly OBV (not shown) did confirm the recent highs but is well below its now- flat weighted moving average
  • There is short-term support now at $10.50 with further support in the $10-$10.20 area
What It Means: Though the agricultural sector is still lagging, the action in the broader commodity markets suggests the correction from the recent highs is likely over. One more pullback to the highs of a few weeks ago is possible, but I would not be surprised to see RJA and DBC at new highs by the end of the summer.

How to Profit: As recommended in May, buyers of the Elements Rogers Total Return ETN (RJI) should be 50% long at $9.24 and 50% long at $9.08 with a stop at $8.57. On a close above $10.05, raise the stop to $8.77.

The PowerShares DB Commodity Index ETF (DBC) missed my initial buying zone by just eight cents. I would now go 50% long at $30.06 and 50% long at $29.77 with a stop at $28.66 (risk of approx. 4.3%).

For the Elements Rogers International Agricultural Total Return ETN (RJA), buyers should be long 50% long at $9.96, although the second buying zone at $9.54 was missed. Use a stop now at $8.94.

In the May article, I recommended going50% long the United States Oil Fund (USO) at $38.66 and 50% long at $37.94. Both positions were stopped out at $36.89, resulting in an approximate 3.9% loss.

I also recommended a 50% long position in United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG) at $10.77 and a 50% long position at $10.44. Keep the stop at $9.89, as UNG closed Wednesday at $11.02.

Sunday, July 17, 2011

Tremonti: "We are on the Titanic ..."

vignetta di Makkox

Ricordate quando Pinocchio Tvemonti invitava a spendere (i nostri soldi, non i suoi) in quanto la crisi era solo psicologica, bisognava far girare l’economia? Era il 2009, mica mille anni fa. E quando, sempre lui, il superministro che tutto il mondo ci invidia (ma sarà vero?) sosteneva che “la crisi è superata, grazie a noi, la sinistra mente”. Anche in questo caso sembra passato tantissimo tempo, ma era solo l’anno scorso. È facile dare addosso a chi non si lascia andare a facili ottimisti e resta ancorato alla realtà, facendo la parte del gufo triste, della cassandra portasfiga capace solo di preconizzare avvenimenti drammatici, luttuosi. Eppure tutti i nodi vengono al pettine, e le bugie hanno le gambe corte. Infatti lo stesso Tvemonti, ora invoca l’aiuto dell’opposizione. “Siamo sul Titanic”, dice. “Il debito ci divora”, sostiene. Ma cosa ha fatto il governo in tutti questi anni per lo sviluppo? Ben poco, a sentire l’autorevole Financial Times, secondo il quale “In un mondo ideale Silvio Berlusconi si sarebbe già dimesso”. Ma non per il bunga bunga e le barzellette idiote, bensì per la sua cronica mancanza di credibilità, “per convincere i mercati che l’Italia è affidabile”. E per farlo non basta un pacchetto di misure di austerità, servirebbero provvedimenti in grado di far crescere il nostro Paese. Che magari siano anche in sintonia con quanto democraticamente espresso dagli elettori il 12 e il 13 giugno. Quando cioè hanno detto basta alle privatizzazioni all’italiana che finora hanno portato solo svantaggi ai contribuenti (e invece la manovra dà mandato a una dismissione in tempi più rapidi del patrimonio dello Stato).  Come fa a girare l’economia se tutto quello che il “genio della finanza creativa” sa inventarsi è la mancata rivalutazione di pensioni normalissime, che spesso sono utilizzate come vero e proprio ammortizzatore sociale, dato che servono a pagare gli studi ai figli, o per aiutarli a sopravvivere, data la precarietà dei loro lavori malpagati? O l’ennesimo aumento delle accise sulla benzina, che colpisce tutti i cittadini e che sicuramente non contribuisce a far girare l’economia, dato che come si sa con il carburante aumentano anche tutti i beni, dato che il trasporto più caro viene fatto ricadere sull’acquirente?

(vignetta di Makkox)
Ricordate quando Pinocchio Tvemonti invitava a spendere (i nostri soldi, non i suoi) in quanto la crisi era solo psicologica, bisognava far girare l’economia? Era il 2009, mica mille anni fa. E quando, sempre lui, il superministro che tutto il mondo ci invidia (ma sarà vero?) sosteneva che “la crisi è superata, grazie a noi, la sinistra mente”. Anche in questo caso sembra passato tantissimo tempo, ma era solo l’anno scorso. È facile dare addosso a chi non si lascia andare a facili ottimisti e resta ancorato alla realtà, facendo la parte del gufo triste, della cassandra portasfiga capace solo di preconizzare avvenimenti drammatici, luttuosi. Eppure tutti i nodi vengono al pettine, e le bugie hanno le gambe corte. Infatti lo stesso Tvemonti, ora invoca l’aiuto dell’opposizione. “Siamo sul Titanic”, dice. “Il debito ci divora”, sostiene. Ma cosa ha fatto il governo in tutti questi anni per lo sviluppo? Ben poco, a sentire l’autorevole Financial Times, secondo il quale “In un mondo ideale Silvio Berlusconi si sarebbe già dimesso”. Ma non per il bunga bunga e le barzellette idiote, bensì per la sua cronica mancanza di credibilità, “per convincere i mercati che l’Italia è affidabile”. E per farlo non basta un pacchetto di misure di austerità, servirebbero provvedimenti in grado di far crescere il nostro Paese. Che magari siano anche in sintonia con quanto democraticamente espresso dagli elettori il 12 e il 13 giugno. Quando cioè hanno detto basta alle privatizzazioni all’italiana che finora hanno portato solo svantaggi ai contribuenti (e invece la manovra dà mandato a una dismissione in tempi più rapidi del patrimonio dello Stato). Come fa a girare l’economia se tutto quello che il “genio della finanza creativa” sa inventarsi è la mancata rivalutazione di pensioni normalissime, che spesso sono utilizzate come vero e proprio ammortizzatore sociale, dato che servono a pagare gli studi ai figli, o per aiutarli a sopravvivere, data la precarietà dei loro lavori malpagati? O l’ennesimo aumento delle accise sulla benzina, che colpisce tutti i cittadini e che sicuramente non contribuisce a far girare l’economia, dato che come si sa con il carburante aumentano anche tutti i beni, dato che il trasporto più caro viene fatto ricadere sull’acquirente?

See the original article >>

European Bank Stress Test; Only Eight? Europe Is In Peril!

by Stephen Pope


Council of Europe's definition of Europe
Image via Wikipedia

One does not have to dig too deep to discover the exposure level of the banks from the “big” European nations, France, Germany and the UK. Liability risk to the nations that have already been bailed out i.e. Greece, Ireland and Portugal sums to €500Bn. If one broadens the sweep to include exposure to Italy and Spain then the figure leaps to €2Tn. So imagine my concern, but not surprise to learn that the European Banking Authority, (EBA) has revealed that in the course of the 2011 stress tests a mere 8 out of the 90 
European banks that undertook stress tests have failed. the EBA claimed that the test would ensure the banks could withstand another financial crisis. What a sham. What a wasted opportunity. In fact beyond the broken 8 a further 16 are considered as in the danger zone. Spain had 5 banks fail the financial healthchecks, 2 Greek banks failed and there was 1 from Austria. I wish for once, the European authorities would be bold and actually design a test that is rigerous. I do not want to see failure for the sake of it, but the financial community at a global level deserves and should demand better. Still, fudge, duck and cover have become a bywords for being European when matters of sovereign debtand bank liquidity are being discussed.

The EBA has called for European financial regulatory authorities to ensure that any recognised capital inadequacybe addressed with all haste. shortfalls in capital are resolved as a matter of priority.
In the UK, the Financial Services Authority, (FSA), said: “…We welcome the publication of the EBA stress tests… The results support our own stress tests…”

The Spanish situation is less convincing as Pastor, Unnim, Caja3, Catalunya Caixa and CAM failed and a further 7 are deemed to be close to the edge. However, as to heeding the words of the EBA, it seems as though Spain is dragging its feet. The Governor of the Bank of Spain said injecting additional capital into failing banks was not relevant. Many of its banks were undergoing fundamental restructuring as a result of sovereign debt crisis fears. I cannot believe that when Spain could be the next sovereign domino to topple, the Spanish authorities are being so casual in their approach.

I cannot help but think that the EBA are looking at financial life with a 12 month lag. They say that the test of 2011 will prompt all banks to rebuild their balances to ensure that they hold enough capital to secure themselves against future liabilities. Just a moment…I thought they were meant to be doing that straight after the 2010 test? Perhaps the perception that the ECB will always help has become the normal way of Iberian banking behaviour. This has a degree of justification as the Bank of Portugal said that 2 of its banks, Banco Comercial Portugues and Espirito Santo Financial Group will now strengthen their capital reserves within 3 months. The country has already received a bail-out worth €78 billion earlier this year; so why are they going to take another 3 months?

We are now on the boundary of treading where too many Europeans have feared to go for too long. The last 2 weeks have seen serious questions be asked about Italy. Marketmind has questioned the sovereign before, but now it appears to be official. the level of debt to GDP in Italy is 120.3%, (Greece 124.8%) and Italian GDP growth after debt servicing in 2011 will be -2.5% (Greece -19.3%), and there is now serious concerns as to whether Italy and at least some of its banks will be dragged into the sovereign debt crisis. Were Italy to be denied access to the international capital marketsthe issues would be severe. The average maturity on Italian national debt is just 7.1 years (Greece 6.8 years). It is the scale of the debt that is most alarming as Italy owes 25% of all the debt in the Euro Zone. It is not just Italy that would feel pain for French banks are seen to hold roughly €90Bn in Italian sovereign debt and have a total exposure to Italy i.e. sovereign plus financial instutions plus corporates of €360Bn. If Italy struggles, the European project will collapse.
To start addressing the matter, albiet with a gun to their heads, the Italian parliament approved a €70Bn austerity package and Italy’s central bank said that all Italian banks had passed the tests. I do not want overstate the Italian case as the banks do have huge deposit bases on which to call…but it is valuable to look further out beyond the immediate crisis, perhaps we need to start digging fire breaks, before the flames engulf Europe completely.

The road to Rome

by Economist

In the first of three articles on the worsening debt crisis, we examine the spread of contagion to Italy
EVER since Europe’s sovereign-debt saga began, euro-area policymakers have feared that the turmoil afflicting first Greece, and then Ireland and Portugal, would engulf larger economies. Most attention had focused on Spain, a country that remains in peril. This week, however, contagion spread to another and even more alarming place: Italy.

Starting on July 8th bond markets staged an unexpected buyers’ strike, driving yields on Italian debt to their highest levels in a decade. These violent moves were mirrored by sharp falls in the shares of Italian banks. Markets calmed in mid-week amid talk that the European Central Bank had started buying peripheral debt. But the psychological damage has been done. The possibility that Italy, the euro area’s third-largest economy and the world’s third-biggest issuer of government bonds, might be sucked into the debt crisis cannot now be denied.
The sell-off was in many respects overdone. Italy’s gross debt-to-GDP ratio is large, at 120%, and the country has a chronic growth problem, but it is not insolvent. Its primary balance (ie, excluding interest payments) is in surplus and the average maturity of its debt is a reasonable seven years. Plenty of other countries have debt profiles that are just as worrying (see table). Italy has a vibrant export sector that could thrive further if the country were more competitive.
That does not necessarily mean the markets were being irrational. Were Italy to be frozen out of the bond markets, let alone default, the effects would be enormous. Italy owes about a quarter of all government debt in the euro zone. Its bonds are held by banks and insurers across the region. Stress tests of Europe’s biggest banks are due to be released on July 15th and are expected to show that the region’s banking system could absorb the losses from a Greek default with only a dozen or so banks having to raise extra capital. Losses from Ireland or Portugal could similarly be contained. But steep falls in the value of Italian or Spanish government debt risk a wave of bank failures.

French banks held almost $100 billion of Italian sovereign debt at the end of last year (and had total exposures to Italy that were about four times larger), according to the Bank for International Settlements. That is more than their combined exposure to Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain. “If the crisis reaches Italy, which I don’t think it will, then France will probably be part of the hurricane,” says a senior Italian banker. American money-market funds, a big source of short-term funding for European banks, are already said to be trimming their exposures to French banks.

The immediate cause of the sharp fall in bond prices seems to have been rooted in the byzantine world of Italian politics, and in particular, an acrimonious spat between Silvio Berlusconi, the prime minister, and Giulio Tremonti, the finance minister, over provisions in an emergency budget. Mr Berlusconi ridiculed Mr Tremonti, who is trusted by markets, as someone who “thinks he’s a genius and believes that everyone else is a cretin”.

Other domestic factors also fed the sell-off. One is an imminent surge in bond redemptions: €175 billion ($247 billion) in Italian government paper (11% of total marketable debt) comes due in the second half of this year. Another was the fact that Mr Tremonti’s budget package was less austere than initially billed: of €40 billion in deficit-cutting measures, €34 billion were put off until 2013 and 2014, by which time a new government will be in office. Lots of cuts were short on detail. A provision in the budget to increase the flat-rate stamp duty on government bonds, rendering them considerably less appealing to retail investors, did not help.

Events abroad played their part, too. Signals that the endless fumbling over Greece’s second bail-out will end in debt restructuring prompted investor flight from core euro-zone countries as well as peripheral ones. Long-term buyers of government bonds such as pension funds and insurers held back, leading to an almost total closure of the Italian bond market. “If Greece is going to become disorderly then you don’t want to be overweight Italy,” says Andrew Balls of PIMCO, the world’s largest bond investor.

This downward spiral may have been exacerbated by Europe’s efforts to cut the value of Greek sovereign debt without triggering a payout on credit-default-swap contracts. That would leave many holders of Greek debt without protection from losses, encouraging them to hedge their risk by betting against other euro-denominated debt like Italy’s. It also encourages holders of Italian debt to sell bonds rather than insure them with policies that may not pay out. Government pressure on banks to maintain their holdings in Greece may also have prompted concern that similar coercion could emerge elsewhere. A downgrade of Irish debt by Moody’s, a ratings agency, added to the nervousness.

Be afraid, don’t panic

The prospect of Italy being sucked into a debt trap in which it has to borrow more simply to service existing debt is, for the moment, remote. Most of the country’s debt need not be refinanced for years, so it would take a while before higher rates fed through. Analysts at UBS reckon that even if ten-year interest rates were to spike to 10% on Italian debt—they briefly topped 6% on July 12th—its average borrowing costs would rise by only 0.5 percentage points a year over the next four years.
 Explore our interactive guide to Europe's troubled economies

Its banking system is also relatively insulated from turmoil in bond markets, with more than 90% of loans funded by retail deposits. Many of its biggest banks have stocked up on excess liquidity. “The Italian banks are much stronger than they look,” says Paolo Bordogna of Bain & Co, a consultancy that has worked with several. “They typically have strong retail franchises with loyal customers.”

Italy has also moved swiftly to shore up confidence, fast-tracking a vote on the budget as well as proposals to privatise state-owned assets. Italy’s deficit, already among the smallest in the euro zone, is set to shrink further. By 2014 Italy expects to be paying down its debt. Senior Italian figures are also pressing for more fundamental changes to free up a moribund economy and spur growth. “Italy only reacts under an emergency,” says the boss of an Italian financial institution. “Now there is one.”

Politici e banchieri

di Ida Magli

Il sabato 9 luglio 2011 è una data che gli Italiani non debbono dimenticare. E’ il giorno, infatti, in cui il Ministro Tremonti, senza dare nessuna giustificazione del fatto che non paga l’affitto della casa dove abita, ha risposto ai giornalisti che gli domandavano se avesse intenzione di dimettersi, con una frase lapidaria: “Non mi dimetto perché sono io che garantisco l’Italia davanti all’Europa: se cado io, cade l’Italia e se cade l’Italia cade l’euro. E’ una catena.” In nessun periodo della storia d’Occidente un uomo politico, quale che fosse la sua importanza, ha mai potuto fare una simile affermazione. Né un conquistatore come Napoleone, né uno Zar come Pietro il Grande né un Re come Luigi XIV, né un Imperatore come Filippo di Spagna, perché essi rappresentavano l’immagine politica, non la dimensione concreta degli Stati, la forza dei popoli che vi vivono. Quelle di Tremonti, invece, per quanto terribili, non sono parole vane. La situazione è proprio quella che lui ha riassunto nell’affermazione: se cado io cade l’Italia e cade l’euro. In altri termini, l’Europa va in rovina perché il potere è nelle mani di una decina di banchieri, e sono essi a quantificarne la forza, giocandola in Borsa. Giocatori che soltanto la penna di Dostojewski sarebbe in grado di descrivere, questi banchieri hanno messo sul tavolo da gioco le Nazioni e non si alzeranno fino a quando non le avranno giocate tutte, essendo loro ad avere in mano il banco.

Il dramma, dunque, è tutto qui. Firmando il trattato di Maastricht i politici hanno trasferito il proprio potere nelle mani dei banchieri. Oggi debbono riprenderselo, non possono fare altro che riprenderselo. Il che significa avere il coraggio di creare, senza indugio e senza discussioni, una nuova banca nazionale e stampare in proprio la moneta necessaria al bilancio dello Stato. I titoli dello Stato li compreranno esclusivamente i suoi cittadini (come avviene in Cina, in Russia e ovunque ci siano governi degni di questo nome) e non saranno collocati nella borsa mondiale alla mercé di chiunque voglia impadronirsene. Sono già pronti molti studi e molti progetti, elaborati da economisti italiani e stranieri di grande competenza, per la rinascita della moneta nazionale, e sono anche molti i politici, presenti in diversi Partiti, dal Pdl alla Lega, a Io amo l’Italia all’Italia dei Valori (con un’interpellanza parlamentare dell’on. Di Pietro sulla questione della sovranità monetaria) che sarebbero favorevoli a questa decisione e aspettano soltanto che qualcuno prenda la parola per primo. Si tratta di una decisione che comporterà moltissimi sacrifici, ma alla quale non c’è scelta perché uno Stato che intraprende la strada dei prestiti a interesse con la Banca centrale europea, non sarà mai in grado di restituirli e alla fine crollerà. Abbiamo la Grecia sotto gli occhi: dopo un orribile tira e molla, indegno di un qualsiasi concetto di civiltà, per concederle dei prestiti ad altissimo interesse, oggi la Bce dichiara che il fallimento della Grecia è inevitabile. Non è forse stato imposto pochi giorni fa all’Italia, di cui a sua volta si dice che stia per fallire, di contribuire per il 17% al totale dei miliardi prestati alla Grecia? Debitori sull’orlo della rovina costretti a prestare denaro a chi sta per fallire? C’è in Italia qualche politico che abbia conservato il minimo di buon senso necessario per rendersi conto della “follia” (se è follia e non rapina preordinata) di simili comportamenti?

E’ indispensabile abbandonare ladri e folli al loro destino. Nessuno si illuda che esistano alternative alla decisione di produrre in proprio la moneta. Il meccanismo che sta portando alla rovina gli Stati europei non è dovuto a un qualche imprevedibile incidente ma è intrinseco alla creazione dell’euro, cosa che è stata detta e ripetuta innumerevoli volte da economisti e monetaristi di ogni tendenza politica. Non può sussistere una moneta che non fa capo a uno Stato e che non risponde alle necessità di questo Stato, in quanto la moneta di per sé è stata inventata proprio per essere uno “strumento” e non un “fine”. In Europa, invece, gli Stati sono stati costretti a mettersi al servizio dell’euro, piegandosi a poco a poco a costruire un mercato adatto all’euro, limitando le possibilità di scambio delle merci, coltivando carote su misura, uccidendo mucche, distruggendo arance… Per gli storici di domani l’Europa dell’Unione costituirà l’esempio più evidente di una società che delira. Siamo però ancora in tempo a cercare di non morirne.

Follow Us