Thursday, May 19, 2011

The Coming Great Inflation


The table displayed immediately below is likely to surprise even our most-jaded readers. It shows the astronomical increase in cash prices for well-known food commodities over the past 12 months. With inarguable exactness, it contradicts the nearly constant prattle in the mainstream press that inflation is under control, or that it is peaking and likely to come under control sometime soon. Some items on the list have doubled -- even tripled -- in price over the past year. Others have risen at mere double-digit rates. 

These numbers signal a potentially serious inflation shock for the American consumer down the road as wholesale food inflation feeds through to consumer prices. It should be noted too that these are the rates of increase AFTER the highly publicized corrections during the first two weeks of May.
Cash Prices Food Commodities
(Prices for actual physical commodiities, not futures)
5/11/11 Year Ago Change
Grains and feeds
Barley, top-quality Mnpls; $ per 6.2 3.15 + 96.8%
Bran, wheat middlings, Kn. City; $ per ton 178 43 +314.0%
Corn, No. 2 yellow. Cent. Ill. 6.605 3.48 +89.8%
Corn gluten feed, Midwest, ton 150.42 51.59 +191.6%
Cottonseed meal, ton 268 175 +53.1%
Hominy feed, Cent. Ill. Ton 205 77 +166.2%
Meat-bonemeal, 50% pro Mnpls ton 440 280 +57.1%
Oats, No. 2 milling, Mnpls; $ per 3.42 1.955 +74.9%
Sorghum, (Milo) No. 2 Gulf cwt 11.275 6.76 +66.8%
Soybean Meal, Cent. Ill., rail, ton 48% 335.6 291.9 +15.0%
Soybeans, No. 1 yellow Illinois 13.14 9.37 +40.2%
Wheat, Spring 14%-pro Mnpls; $ 9 4.4225 +103.5%
Wheat, No. 2 soft red, St.Louis, shel 7.72 4.81 +60.5%
Wheat, hard, KC 7.575 4.025 +88.2%
Wheat, No. 1 soft white, del Portland, Ore 12.1025 6.2825 +92.6%

Foods
Beef choice 1-3,600-900 lbs. 166.68 154.05 +8.2%
Beef select 1-3,600-900 lbs. 160.27 150.17 +6.7%
Broilers, dressed 'A'; per lb. 0.865 0.865 0.0%
Broilers, 12-city comp weighted avg 0.8458 0.8527 -0.8%
Butter, AA Chicago, lb. 2.05 1.605 +27.7%
Cheddar cheese, barrels, Chicago lb. 165.25 140.75 +17.4%
Milk, Nonfat dry, Chicago 164 130 +26.2%
Cocoa, Ivory Coast, $ per metric ton 3637 3566 +2.0%
Coffee, Brazilian, Comp. 2.7637 1.2962 +113.2%
Coffee, Colombian, NY lb. 3.0974 2.0139 +53.8%
Eggs, large white, Chicago dozen 0.885 0.595 +48.7%
Flour, hard winter Kansas City cwt 22.55 13.7 +64.6%
Hogs, Iowa-South Minnesota avg. cwt 88.04 82.49 +6.7%
Pork loins, 13-19 lbs, Mid-US lb 1.415 1.54 -8.1%
Steers, feeder, Oklahoma City, avg cwt 142.13 128.19 +10.9%
Sugar, cane, raw, world, lb. fob 26.31 19.54 +34.6%

Data Source: Wall Steet Jounal Market Data Center

The Bureau of Labor Statistics likes to underplay the role of food and energy in the cost of living and emphasize instead the less volatile core inflation rate. "If you don't eat or drive, inflation's no problem," the New York Times once quipped in a headline. For the typical American, though, the price of food is unquestionably a major issue, as well as a real-life indicator for prices across the spectrum of goods and services. In fact, for most, if food prices are rising that is the very definition of inflation and, as our table illustrates, food prices have risen with a vengeance.

 

I Can't Eat an i-Pad

William Dudley, president of the New York Federal Reserve, rationalized at a townhall meeting in Queens recently that "you can buy an iPad2 that costs the same as an iPad1 that is twice as powerful. You have to look at the prices of all things." A voice quickly came from the back of the room: "I can't eat an iPad!" Newsweek magazine thought enough of the retort to label it "the line that launched the Great Inflation of the 2010s."

Inflationary concerns go beyond that of the citizenry to those who manage vast capital pools for governments and large institutions. Last month, Mexico's central bank surprised gold market experts with the announcement of its acquisition of 93 tonnes of the metal. The central bank's Governor, Agustin Carstens, denied publicly that the purchase reflected a lack of confidence in the U.S. dollar. At the same time, it is difficult to explain the motivation as anything else. Interestingly, Carstens was quoted by Bloomberg in mid-April that rising commodity prices had "caused uncertainty about the inflation outlook in Mexico" and "complicated the bank's monetary policy." Even as Carstens spoke, Mexico was in the process of mitigating those concerns with an unprecedented gold purchase -- the third largest over the past decade.
Similarly, the University of Texas stunned the market with its announcement of a $1 billion physical gold purchase. Kyle Bass, the hedge fund manager and board member who recommended the UT purchase, said, "Central banks are printing more money than they ever have, so what's the value of money in terms of purchases of goods and services. I look at gold as just another currency that they can't print any more of."

 

Adding inflation to systemic risk, gold's best days may still lie ahead

Since 2001, gold's bull market has been driven principally by systemic risks, not by inflation -- a circumstance that should give us all pause. Add rampant inflation to the mix, and you have the impetus for even stronger demand in the months and years to come. Mexico and the University of Texas are not alone in hoping to shore up their balance sheets with gold. The list in fact grows longer by the day.

Robin Griffiths is the highly-regarded City of London chartist who plies his trade at Cazenove, reportedly stock broker to the Queen. Citing "loose monetary policy," "money printing" and Fed chairman Ben Bernanke's "trashing of the dollar" he believes gold's bull market could go into hyperdrive. "I think it will all be over by 2015," he says, "a lot of it depends on how aggressively paper monies get printed from here on in. I think $3,000 is an absolute minimum target. I can believe in targets certainly above $5,000 and it's theoretically possible to go to $12,000. . ." 

Those targets should be taken with a grain of salt as should the 2015 timeline, but it gives you an idea what some contemplate for the gold price in the face of an accelerated inflationary, or even hyperinflationary, assault on the dollar's value. Ultimately, what the parabolic increase in cash food commodities over the past year is telling us is that gold's best days may still lie ahead.



King Ibn Saud's 35,000 British Sovereigns Gold's historic undervaluation versus oil

The Wikileaks/Financial Times revelations on significant gold buying interest in the Middle East — notably Iran's central bank, Jordan's central bank and Qatar's sovereign wealth fund — brought to mind the story of Saudi Arabia's King Ibn Saud and his sale of oil concessions to the major oil companies. In payment he received 35,000 British Sovereigns — a coin many of you hold in your own sovereign wealth funds. The good king understood the difference between the value of gold and the value of a paper promise.

At the time (1933), the British Sovereign's value stood at $8.24 each, or $288,365 for the lot. The price of oil was about 85¢ a barrel, and a British Sovereign could buy about ten barrels.

Today those same Sovereigns would bring a little less than $12 million at melt value ($338.00 each) and a barrel of oil is selling for about $115. Thus, a British Sovereign can buy a little under three barrels of oil — a statistic which gives you an inkling of gold's current undervaluation.

For gold to buy the same amount of oil now that it did in 1933, the price would have to go to nearly $5000 per ounce — an interesting calculation for those who think gold is overvalued and in a bubble.

In the gold market where there's smoke, there's fire. If members within one class of investors — e.g., central banks, sovereign wealth funds or hedge funds — you can be assured that other members of that same group are similarly involved. Recent activity within the hedge fund industry with respect to gold is exemplary. It follows then that if Iran, Qatar and Jordan — themselves threatened by the popular Pan-Arabic uprisings — are acting on their interest in gold, can Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait be far behind?
If so, they will join several nation-states and a bevy of hedge and sovereign wealth funds in the pursuit. The problem they will encounter is an old one. There simply is not enough physical gold available at any given point in time to satisfy the needs of any one of these major players, let alone all of them. All of this, of course, will resolve itself in the price for which the metal sells.

I note with interest that Barclays Bank — one of the five members of the London Gold Fix and an institution well-situated to experience first-hand the interest in physical metal — has predicted a top price for 2011 of $1620 per ounce. Predictions by other Fix members are equally bullish. Scotia-Mocatta predicts a high range of $1500 to $1600 with a possibility of a spike higher. Deutsche Bank is predicting $1511 per ounce for 2011 and $2000 per ounce for 2012. Both Societe General and HSBC, the two remaining members, are calling for a top-end price of $1550 per ounce. These bullion banks are in a better position than most to ascertain the sources of physical demand, and they know better than anyone the extent of global interest among key players. By the way Goldman Sachs, though not a member of the Fix, is still widely monitored for its opinion on gold. It has set a price objective of $1690 per ounce for 2011.

Short & Sweet

THE RECENT SHARP GOLD AND SILVER PRICE CORRECTIONS of early May caused a wave of purchases in India. In fact bullion dealers reported some of the best volumes this year. India accounts for roughly 20% of annual gold demand. Financial Times reported that "in Mumbai's bustling Zaveri market, the gold hub of India's wealthiest city, traders were suffering from no such jitters. Indeed, they were fiercely elbowing one another to grab as many shiny bars as possible last Friday amid expectations that falling prices would cause demand to soar." At USAGOLD, we talk about what we call the "India indicator." When there is profusion of callers with an Indian accent, we start looking for the market to put in a bottom.

BLOOMBERG REPORTS THAT "SALES OF GOLD COINS are on track for the best month in a year amid the worst commodities rout since 2008, a sign that bullion's longest bull market in nine decades has further to run, if history is a guide. The U.S. Mint sold 85,000 ounces of American Eagle coins since May 1 as the Standard & Poor's GSCI Index of 24 raw materials fell 9.9 percent. The last time sales reached that level, bullion rose 21 percent in the next year. Gold will advance 17 percent to a record $1,750 an ounce by Dec. 31 and keep gaining in 2012, the median estimate in a Bloomberg survey of 31 analysts, traders and investors shows."


AS WE GO TO PRESS, THE TREASURY DEPARTMENT REPORTS that the United States will exceed its $14.294 trillion debt limit by Monday, May 16, 2011. Default, if Congress fails to increase that ceiling, will occur in early August. 57% of Americans are opposed to raising the debt ceiling, according to the Gallup Poll. Fed chairman Ben Bernanke warns of grave consequences over the government's ability to borrow, including a spike in interest rates and "severe instability in the financial markets." 

HINDLE CAPITAL'S BEN DAVIES, an analyst with whom we find ourselves agreeing on a regular basis, says that it's not speculation driving gold and silver prices higher, but monetary debasement. Blaming speculators for rising commodity prices is like blaming the weatherman for the weather.

THE USAGOLD WEBSITE CONTINUES TO GROW by leaps and bounds. We recently were forced to go to a dedicated server to keep up with the traffic. Our mobile pages are leading the way. Smart phone users like the user-friendly live price page, and also frequent the news link offered there regularly.
WE HAVE ADDED A VIDEO VERSION of our Daily Market Report linked through our mobile page. Hosted by Jonathan Kosares, it provides an easy way for you to keep up with the issues and events driving the gold market on your smart phone.

JULIAN PHILLIPS (GOLD FORCASTER): "The Chinese mining sector is currently producing 340 tonnes of gold a year and rising. No doubt there is every encouragement from the State for this figure to rise. We believe that no matter how high it rises, little if any of that supply will reach the world's 'open' market in London. Even global gold production is not likely to rise significantly from the current level of around 2,500 tonnes. Therein lies a development that, in itself, will change global gold market dynamics."

TOCQUEVILLE GOLD FUND'S JOHN HATHAWAY on the recent corrections in gold and silver: "It's not a trend change. Just take a couple of weeks off and come back to it. The investment thesis is not at all in question here. It's just the dynamics of the market."

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL'S DAVED COTTLE ASKS WHY Greece and Portugal, which own 112 tonnes and 383 tonnes of gold respectively, shouldn't be forced to liquidate their gold. Back in July, 2010, we puzzled how it was that the Bank for International Settlements would suddenly show 382 tonnes of gold on its balance sheet at precisely the same time that Portugal's debt and fiscal problems were making financial headlines. Our view then was that Portugal had pawned its gold to deal with its financial woes. The answer to Mr. Cottle's question, in at least Portugal's case, could very well be that the family jewels have already been pawned.
IN CASE ANYONE THINKS that the current borrowing spree on the part of the federal government is statistically insignificant, we offer the following chart from the St. Louis Federal Reserve. . . And you thought the credit crisis peaked sometime in 2009.

Notable & Quotable

"I think the biggest take-away we can grab from [Mexico] is that another region of the world, another central bank region is buying gold. So, it is not just concentrated in Asia, that it is now in the Americas. So, the potential for another central bank in South America perhaps could be quite high going forward."

- Edel Tully, Union Bank of Switzerland

"Finally, with gold supported by multiple fundamental forces, one of our pre-conditions for a bubble is the asset has to be 'over-owned.' All the gold produced around the world over the past 110 years (which accounts for more than 80% of all gold ever mined) at today's prices is equivalent to only about 3.9% of the combined total value of stocks, bonds and cash around the world. While up from the 1.3% in 2000 when gold prices were depressed, it is similar to the 3.5% in 1990 and well below the whopping 12.1% in 1980 when gold traded near its last peak. While gold's popularity is returning, it does not seem 'over-owned.'"

- Jeff Kleintop, The Street

"The official wisdom is that Greece, Ireland and Portugal have been hit by a liquidity crisis, so they needed a momentary infusion of capital, after which everything would return to normal. But this official version is a lie, one that takes the ordinary people of Europe for idiots. They deserve better from politics and their leaders. To understand the real nature and purpose of the bailouts, we first have to understand who really benefits from them. Let's follow the money. Already under this scheme, Greece, Ireland and Portugal are ruined. They will never be able to save and grow fast enough to pay back the debts with which Brussels has saddled them in the name of saving them."

- Timo Soini, the True Finn Party, Finland

"I've been recommending gold since I started Mad Money . . .There will be moments of fluff but I'm not really trading it . . . I regard it as the currency of your portfolio . . . I feel very strongly we are not in a topping phase. . .I'd rather have the insurance policy of gold rather than the insurance policy of GEICO." 

- James Cramer, CNBC's Mad Money

"The bigger inflation event (QE3?) would use newly created base money for the immediate benefit of debtors. Sending checks to indebted homeowners made out to their creditors would be an example of quantitative easing that would be popular among the masses and economically stimulative. It would allow a new credit bubble to expand and prices of goods, services and assets to increase. We think this form of QE — broad debt socialization – is inevitable."

"All the while we expect precious metals, agricultural, basic materials and energy prices to climb consistently through QE2 and QE3. We believe the bull market in precious metals will run faster and higher than consumable commodities and begin to fade only after a third-wave parabolic price shift higher. We think the bull market in consumable commodities will kick-in significantly once consumer confidence and significant (price-generated) nominal output growth returns."

THE (SLOW) EXIT PLAN….

by Cullen Roche

Today’s FOMC Minutes from the April meeting shed some light on their exit plan (or lack of a plan). They explicitly say that policy normalization will not necessarily begin soon. In essence, their plan appears to be ending QE2, followed by ending QE-lite (reinvestments) followed by rate increases and finally ending with asset sales. They place a 5 year timeframe on the entire exit strategy. In short, expect the Fed to remain pretty close to permanently accommodative:
“Meeting participants agreed on several principles that would guide the Committee’s strategy for normalizing monetary policy. First, with regard to the normalization of the stance of monetary policy, the pace and sequencing of the policy steps would be driven by the Committee’s monetary policy objectives for maximum employment and price stability. Participants noted that the Committee’s decision to discuss the appropriate strategy for normalizing the stance of policy at the current meeting did not mean that the move toward such normalization would necessarily begin soon. Second, to normalize the conduct of monetary policy, it was agreed that the size of the SOMA’s securities portfolio would be reduced over the intermediate term to a level consistent with the implementation of monetary policy through the management of the federal funds rate rather than through variation in the size or composition of the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet. Third, over the intermediate term, the exit strategy would involve returning the SOMA to holding essentially only Treasury securities in order to minimize the extent to which the Federal Reserve portfolio might affect the allocation of credit across sectors of the economy. Such a shift was seen as requiring sales of agency securities at some point. And fourth, asset sales would be implemented within a framework that had been communicated to the public in advance, and at a pace that potentially could be adjusted in response to changes in economic or financial conditions.
In addition, nearly all participants indicated that the first step toward normalization should be ceasing to reinvest payments of principal on agency securities and, simultaneously or soon after, ceasing to reinvest principal payments on Treasury securities. Most participants viewed halting reinvestments as a way to begin to gradually reduce the size of the balance sheet. It was noted, however, that ending reinvestments would constitute a modest step toward policy tightening, implying that that decision should be made in the context of the economic outlook and the Committee’s policy objectives. In addition, changes in the statement language regarding forward policy guidance would need to accompany the normalization process.
Participants expressed a range of views on some aspects of a normalization strategy. Most participants indicated that once asset sales became appropriate, such sales should be put on a largely predetermined and preannounced path; however, many of those participants noted that the pace of sales could nonetheless be adjusted in response to material changes in the economic outlook. Several other participants preferred instead that the pace of sales be a key policy tool and be varied actively in response to changes in the outlook. A majority of participants preferred that sales of agency securities come after the first increase in the FOMC’s target for short-term interest rates, and many of those participants also expressed a preference that the sales proceed relatively gradually, returning the SOMA’s composition to all Treasury securities over perhaps five years. Participants noted that, for any given degree of policy tightening, more-gradual sales that commenced later in the normalization process would allow for an earlier increase of the federal funds rate target from its effective lower bound than would be the case if asset sales commenced earlier and at a more rapid pace. As a result, the Committee would later have the option of easing policy with an interest rate cut if economic conditions then warranted. An earlier increase in the federal funds rate was also mentioned as helpful to limit the potential for the very low level of that rate to encourage financial imbalances. A few participants expressed a preference that sales begin before any increase in the federal funds rate target, and a few other participants indicated that sales and increases in the federal funds rate target should commence at the same time. The participants who favored earlier sales also generally indicated a preference for relatively rapid sales, with some suggesting that agency securities in the SOMA be reduced to zero over as little as one or two years. Such an approach was viewed as allowing for a faster return to a normal policy environment, potentially reducing any upside risks to inflation stemming from outsized reserve balances, and more quickly eliminating any effects of SOMA holdings of agency securities on the allocation of credit.

Most participants saw changes in the target for the federal funds rate as the preferred active tool for tightening monetary policy when appropriate. A number of participants noted that it would be advisable to begin using the temporary reserves-draining tools in advance of an increase in the Committee’s federal funds rate target, in part because doing so would put the Federal Reserve in a better position to assess the effectiveness of the draining tools and judge the size of draining operations that might be required to support changes in the interest on excess reserves (IOER) rate in implementing a desired increase in short-term rates. A number of participants also noted that they would be prepared to sell securities sooner if the temporary reserves-draining operations and the end of the reinvestment of principal payments were not sufficient to support a fairly tight link between increases in the IOER rate and increases in short-term market interest rates.
In the discussion of normalization, some participants also noted their preferences about the longer-run framework for monetary policy implementation. Most of these participants indicated that they preferred that monetary policy eventually operate through a corridor-type system in which the federal funds rate trades in the middle of a range, with the IOER rate as the floor and the discount rate as the ceiling of the range, as opposed to a floor-type system in which a relatively high level of reserve balances keeps the federal funds rate near the IOER rate. A couple of participants noted that any normalization strategy would likely involve an elevated balance sheet with the federal funds rate target near the IOER rate–as in floor-type systems–for some time, and therefore the Committee would accumulate experience during the process of normalizing policy that would allow it to make a more informed choice regarding the longer-term framework at a later date.
The Committee agreed that more discussion of these issues was needed, and no decisions regarding the Committee’s strategy for normalizing policy were made at this meeting.”
See the original article >>

7 IMPOSSIBLE TRADING RULES TO FOLLOW

by Lance Roberts

Over the last two weeks a lot of the bullish sentiment that was imbedded in the market has now given way to fear. We have written many articles posted here on this website about the rules of investing and no one pays attention to such rules until they have broken them all. Now is no different. Just last week I received an email regarding the correction in silver and his recent purchase near the top. After telling him all the reasons that he should sell into a bounce and remove the losing position from the portfolio – ultimately he just wanted to hear that someday it could well return to his purchase price. He is still holding that position today hoping that at some point he will once again break even on the investment.

This attitude is the single most common mistake that investors make. The idea of selling something when it isn’t working is revolting to their very nature, it means they are a loser. This is absolutely the worst possible mistake an investor can make. In investing you have to get used to the idea of losses. They will occur as regularly as the sun rises and sets. The difference between a successful long term investor and an unsuccessful one really comes down to following these very simple rules. Yes, I said simple rules, and they are – but they are the most difficult set of rules for any one individual to follow because of the simple fact that they require you to do the exact OPPOSITE of what your basic human emotions tell you do – buy stuff when it is being liquidated by everyone else and sell stuff when it is going to the moon.

The 7 Impossible Trading Rules To Follow:

Here are the rules – they are not unique or new. They are time tested and successful investor approved. Like Mom’s chicken soup for a cold – the rules are the rules. If you follow them you succeed – if you don’t, you don’t.

1) Sell Losers Short – Let Winners Run: It seems like a simple thing to do but when it comes down to it the average investor sells their winners and keeps their losers hoping they will come back to even.

2) Buy Cheap And Sell Expensive: You haggle, negotiate and shop extensively for the best deals on cars and flat screen televisions. However, you will pay any price for a stock because someone on television told you too. Insist on making investments when you are getting a “good deal” on it. If it isn’t – it isn’t, don’t try and come up with an excuse to justify overpaying for an investment. In the long run – overpaying will end in misery.

3) This Time Is Never Different: As much as our emotions and psychological makeup want to always hope and pray for the best – this time is never different than the past. History may not repeat exactly but it surely rhymes awfully well.

4) Be Patient: As with item number 2; there is never a rush to make an investment and there is NOTHING WRONG with sitting on cash until a good deal, a real bargin, comes along. Being patient is not only a virtue – it is a good way to keep yourself out of trouble.

5) Turn Off The Television: Any good investment is dictated by day to day movements of the market which is merely nothing more than noise. If you have done your homework, made a good investment at a good price and have confirmed your analysis to correct – then the day to day market actions will have little, if any, bearing on the longer term success of your investment. The only thing you achieve by watching the television from one minute to the next is increasing your blood pressure.

6) Risk Is Not Equal To Your Return: Taking RISK in an investment or strategy is not equivalent to how much money you will make. It only relates to the permanent loss of capital that will be incurred when you are wrong. Invest conservatively and grow your money over time with the LEAST amount of risk possible.

7) Go Against The Herd: The populous is generally right in the middle of a move up in the markets but they are seldom right at major turning points. When everyone agrees on the direction of the market due to any given set of reasons – generally something else happens. However, this also cedes to points 2) and 4) – in order to buy something cheap or sell something at the best price – you are generally buying when everyone is selling and selling when everyone else is buying.

These are the rules. They are simple and impossible to follow for most. However, if you can incorporate them you will succeed in your investment goals in the long run. You most likely WILL NOT outperform the markets on the way up but you will not lose as much on the way down. This is important because it is much easier to replace a lost opportunity in investing – it is impossible to replace lost capital.

Market Position

Currently the market has issued a sell signal on a weekly basis which should not be ignored. This implies that you should be increasing exposure to cash and fixed income and reducing exposure to risk based assets. HOWEVER, on a daily basis the markets have gotten oversold so any selling is recommended on a bounce in the markets over the next several days to a week.

Summer months tend to be the weaker months of the year to invested in the markets so reducing some exposure to risk makes some sense. Sell losing positions first on a rally and then trim back positions that have gotten overvalued and stretched during the run up from the lows of last summer.

Holding a cushion of cash will be beneficial over the next couple of months and should we have another correction as we saw last summer (I have marked the retracement levels) we could have several good opportunities to add value to portfolio holdings at better prices.

Economics are showing signs of deterioration on many fronts so we want to keep a watch on the broader macroeconomic issues but from an investment standpoint managing the risk in portfolios is highly important to longer term success. As my uncle used to say - “…if you prune your garden from time to time it will yield a much more bountiful harvest.”

See the original article >>

Disasters send Japanese economy into recession

By TOMOKO A. HOSAKA

Japan's economy shrank in the first quarter, veering back into recession as factory production and consumer spending wilted in the aftermath of March 11 earthquake and tsunami.

Real gross domestic product — a measure of the value of all goods and services produced domestically — contracted at an annualized rate of 3.7 percent in the January-March period, the Cabinet Office said Thursday.

The result marks the second straight quarter that the world's No. 3 economy has lost steam and undershoots an annualized 2.3 percent fall forecast in a Kyodo News agency survey.

While there is no universally accepted definition of a recession, many economists define it as two consecutive quarters of GDP contraction. Others consider the depth of economic decline as well as other measures like unemployment.

Martin Schulz, senior economist at Fujitsu Research Institute in Tokyo, said there is "no doubt" that recession has returned. More surprising is just how quickly the economy crumpled, he said.

The latest GDP report includes just 20 days following the disaster, but "the impact is huge," said Schulz, who had expected to see most of the economic fallout in the second quarter.

The Nikkei 225 stock average fell 0.4 percent to 9,620.82.

The magnitude-9.0 earthquake and tsunami left more than 24,000 people dead or missing, and wiped out entire towns in the hardest-hit areas. Damage is estimated at $300 billion, making it the most expensive natural disaster in history.

It damaged factories in the region, causing severe shortages of parts and components for manufacturers across Japan, especially automakers. A crippled nuclear power plant caused widespread power shortages that added to the headaches faced by businesses and households.

As a result, Japan's factory production and consumer spending both fell the most on record in March. Exports in March went south for the first time in 16 months. Companies are reporting lower earnings and diminished outlooks for the rest of the fiscal year.

The recent events have deeply unnerved households, who are likely to remain cautious for the coming months, Schulz said.

"The nuclear disaster showed just how much is wrong in Japan actually," he said. "And many things that seemed so stable and sure like electricity supply ... are looking not safe at all."

Toyota Motor Corp., Japan's biggest automaker, said last week that its quarterly profit tumbled more than 75 percent because of parts shortages after the tsunami. As of May, the crisis cost the company production of 550,000 vehicles in Japan and another 350,000 overseas.

Toyota is expected to lose its spot as the world's top-selling automaker to General Motors Co. this year.

Even before the disaster, Japan's economy was shaky.

In a historic shift, China overtook the country as the world's No. 2 economy last year. Japan struggled to address a slew of problems including years of deflation, a rapidly aging and shrinking population, and ballooning public debt. Japanese companies increasingly relied on exports to drive growth and offset the persistently lackluster demand at home.

After four solid quarters of growth, Japan's GDP turned negative in the last three months of 2010 due to weaker exports and consumer demand. The downturn was expected to be temporary.

Instead, Japan has now recorded consecutive quarters of contraction for the first time since the global financial crisis. GDP fell for four straight quarters starting April 2008. 

Japan's economy and fiscal policy minister Kaoru Yosano described the current slump as milder than the previous slide, when global demand "evaporated instantly." 

"The Japanese economy's ability to rebound is sufficiently strong," Yosano said, according to Kyodo News agency. 

Goldman Sachs said the economy will likely bottom in the second quarter. It expects GDP to begin growing again in the third quarter as reconstruction bolsters demand in both the private and public sectors. 

"We assume the production and exports will shift to mild growth facilitated by supply chain restoration, although power supply is an uncertain factor," chief Japan economist Naohiko Baba said in a report to clients.
The first-quarter GDP figure translates to a 0.9 percent fall from the previous three month period, according to the Cabinet Office data. 

Consumer spending, which accounts for some 60 percent of the economy, declined 0.6 percent. Capital investments by companies retreated 0.9 percent from the October-December quarter. 

To fund recovery spending, Japan's parliament passed at 4 trillion yen ($49 billion) budget supplement earlier this month. Further government outlays are expected to follow in the months ahead. 

The money will be used to build new houses for the more than 100,000 people who remain without proper shelter, clear debris and rubble, restore fishing grounds, and provide support for disaster-hit businesses and their employers.

See the original article >>

OPEC by the Numbers

By Barry Ritholtz

This is the only part of the graphic; click for the rest


Relative Performance

Follow Us